Posted on 02/27/2006 11:50:59 AM PST by sofaman
Man, it gets no better than this.
What's Sean say ..............???? "hard hitting"...................
Baloney!
I do agree it's ironic that Hannity is sort of taking the same position as Hillary(?) and Schumer. Nevertheless, despite the fact that my particular position on this issue is the subject of Sean's attack, he generally has a different kind of show and is usually more right than wrong. I heard one Senator say on one of the talkshows, "I don't agree with my wife 100% of the time"...and I can attest that's definitely true. We're still on the same side. As Sean just said, the DUmmies are so persistently wrong, it really is scary. So Tony and Rush support my view and Sean doesn't. I hope he's not criticizing my motives but I'll continue listening...Medved's OK, but he's too Holly-wierd.
Has anyone ever been to one of his shows??
then don't listen...one agrees, one disagrees. We can do that honestly and without the ad hominems.
Sounds like he got his butt handed to him in Cincinnati. I'll have to pass that on to my wife. She hates Springer but she was hoping he would kick Vannity's butt following his conduct over the ports issue.
Please explain where he has lied...
Do you notice how many calls from little kids he takes. Im waiting for him to have a shootout with one.
mnehrling gave me that. I was semantically challenged and had confused "support" for Israel with "recognizing" Israel.
Listen bts... I have to go see the tax lady. But keep the mantra going to move on to the sedition issues.
Bye sweetie.
Good Lord! Alert the media! We agreed! Yes, indeed. Rockefeller does deserve jail time.
Remember folks -- its a lib thing to have to march in lock-step.
Since Conservatives believe in indivual rights, we will have differing views. It's ok -- no one is really selling out
True. Even though I disagree with you on Grahmn. I know I am in the minority here but I never got this anti Grahmn feeling and why it happened.
Sean will be surprised, if Lindsay performs as yesterday. When pushed when the interviewer asked, "after 45 days if you are satisfied there is no security risk, will you let this go", he replied in the affirmative. Now Sean may not give him the chance to answer in that way, but if Sean is intellectually honest, he'll at least get the same answer (unless Lindsay's changed).
You sound like an idiot, frankly. Here's what the president himself said last week on the White House lawn about "managing" the ports:
"I think it sends a terrible signal to friends around the world that it's OK for a company from one country to manage the port, but not a country that plays by the rules and has got a good track record from another part of the world can't manage the port," Bush said.
You may disagree with Sean, but your criticism is over the top and hateful. Screw you.
I have to go for a while. But keep this going.
We have a huge problem broiling in the United
States and it's called TRAITORS IN THE SENATE!
Keep it moving on these topics.
I'll be back. You be Mozart. LOL!!!
Its for 100 dollars Annie can get her own so whats good there ?
Vannity keeps saying this is about control of our ports.
DPW will not control any port, it will manage commercial facilities located within a port.
There is a major difference which he knows and which would undermine his position.
Because the President is being forced to respond in fashion because of people like Vannity.
Just lost my drink on that one.
Sean always talks about having no tickets to give away.
Our fair city seems to have failed his sanctimonious show. There were 3000 empty seats in this city. He never mentioned that.
Maybe it's because he didn't have a book to sell.
BUT.............. he just said it again................ he's a Great American......
Pittsburghers are smart.................. they smelled Sean's righteousness coming.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.