Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam Had WMD ( What the Damning Tapes tell us )
Investor's Business Daily ^ | 02/27/2006 | Editorial

Posted on 02/27/2006 11:43:21 AM PST by SirLinksalot

Saddam Had WMD

Now that Leno and Letterman have had their way with Vice President Cheney's hunting accident and the port controversy, maybe we can get back to something really important — like Saddam's WMD program.

Yes, the linchpin of opposition to the Iraq War — never really strong to begin with — has taken some real hits in recent weeks. And "Bush lied" — the anti-war mantra about the president, Saddam Hussein and weapons of mass destruction — looks the most battered.

Inconveniently for critics of the war, Saddam made tapes in his version of the Oval Office. These tapes landed in the hands of American intelligence and were recently aired publicly.

The first 12 hours of the tapes — there are hundreds more waiting to be translated — are damning, to say the least. They show conclusively that Bush didn't lie when he cited Saddam's WMD plans as one of the big reasons for taking the dictator out.

Nobody disputes the tapes' authenticity. On them, Saddam talks openly of programs involving biological, chemical and, yes, nuclear weapons.

War foes have long asserted that Saddam halted his WMD programs in the wake of his defeat in the first Gulf War in 1991. Saddam's abandonment of WMD programs was confirmed by subsequent U.N. inspections.

Again, not true. In a tape dating to April 1995, Saddam and several aides discuss the fact that U.N. inspectors found traces of Iraq's biological weapons program. On the tape, Hussein Kamel, Saddam's son-in-law, is heard gloating about fooling the inspectors.

"We did not reveal all that we have," he says. "Not the type of weapons, not the volume of the materials we imported, not the volume of the production we told them about, not the volume of use. None of this was correct."

There's more.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: billtierney; iraq; iraqdocs; proxies; saddam; saddamtapes; tapes; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 02/27/2006 11:43:26 AM PST by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

And is in not intresting how the Democrat Senate Election Comittee timed their Port Hysteria PR blitz to shove the Saddam tapes off the headlines?


2 posted on 02/27/2006 11:46:27 AM PST by MNJohnnie ("Good men don't wait for the polls. They stand on principle and fight."-Soul Seeker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
On the tape, Hussein Kamel, Saddam's son-in-law, is heard gloating about fooling the inspectors.

I'm sure this required great deception skills, like playing "peek-a-boo" with a 3 month old.....

3 posted on 02/27/2006 11:46:54 AM PST by Onelifetogive (* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
What the Damning Tapes tell us

They don't mean a damn thing. I recall listening to slick willy tell a group of people that he turned down an offer from the Sudan for Osama. Yet, the 9/11 Commission never mentioned it in their report because they didn't have ANY evidence that he actually tuned the offer down.

Not even his OWN VOICE was good enough.

4 posted on 02/27/2006 11:47:58 AM PST by Puppage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
Wait a minute....the left has been telling us that he did not have WMD's. Does this mean they lied to us?.....just shocking!!!!!!
5 posted on 02/27/2006 11:48:14 AM PST by Kimmers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
this can not be bttt'ed enough.

(Well, technically it can be, but you get the idea...)

6 posted on 02/27/2006 11:48:27 AM PST by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
Hummm, this would mean who was lying?
7 posted on 02/27/2006 11:49:29 AM PST by spaatzcadet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

I am getting the NYT stragtegy rady.
All of Saddam's Generals and scientists just told him what he wanted to hear, that they had WMDs.
Actually, they realized the folly of messing with the Clinton Administration and especially with Hillary because they knew that she would be President in 08'. So, Bush did lie because there never were really WMDs.

Ready Set Go.....What is the over/under before the NYT or DU starts saying this?


8 posted on 02/27/2006 11:50:51 AM PST by Holicheese (GO BU-2006 Beanpot Champs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

I like the fact that the truth of the WMD's is slowly creeping into the sunlight-- but ultimately I don't give a rat's ass if we find them or not-- or even if they existed at all.

Taking out Iraq was the right thing to do by any standard.


9 posted on 02/27/2006 11:51:51 AM PST by agooga (Less of the stuff that is bad for you / more of the stuff that is good for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agooga

Totally agree and BTTT.


10 posted on 02/27/2006 11:55:14 AM PST by KJC1 (Getting the facts before flipping out is generally a sound idea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
I was talking to a coworker not ten minutes ago.

He is convinced that Bush and Cheney are trigger happy drunks who were "eager" to go to war.

He's a real nice guy but he just refuses to believe the facts like those presented in this Op-Ed piece. For some reason the lefties just block out the truth if it contradicts their preconceived notions.
11 posted on 02/27/2006 11:58:59 AM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

KERRY CHIMP McHITLER LIED!!!! omg wtf bbq.


12 posted on 02/27/2006 11:59:12 AM PST by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

From the article:

Perhaps most chillingly, the tapes record Iraq Foreign Minister Tariq Aziz talking about how easy it would be to set off a WMD in Washington. The comments come shortly after Saddam muses about using "proxies" in a terror attack.

13 posted on 02/27/2006 11:59:29 AM PST by KJC1 (Getting the facts before flipping out is generally a sound idea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Can't wait to see this reported on CBSABCNBCCNN news tonight!


14 posted on 02/27/2006 12:01:59 PM PST by b4its2late (Terrorists will either succeed in changing our way of life, or we will change theirs. - Rummy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repub4bush; gardencatz; feefee; Misty Memory

Ping.


15 posted on 02/27/2006 12:03:17 PM PST by KJC1 (Getting the facts before flipping out is generally a sound idea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

Hope you aren't holding your breath!


16 posted on 02/27/2006 12:03:23 PM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive
In other words...

The UN Inspectors had the mentality of 3-year olds???

17 posted on 02/27/2006 12:05:04 PM PST by ExcursionGuy84 ("Jesus, Your Love takes my breath away.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bookmaestro

ping


18 posted on 02/27/2006 12:08:42 PM PST by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive

"We will send you a sternly-worded letter....!"

19 posted on 02/27/2006 12:08:50 PM PST by My2Cents ("The essence of American journalism is vulgarity divested of truth." -- Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
For some reason the lefties just block out the truth if it contradicts their preconceived notions

That's the sad truth about libs. They'd rather believe we killed a bunch of innocent people for no good reason than to believe that we did the right thing. It's really sick when you think about it.

20 posted on 02/27/2006 12:14:44 PM PST by Unkosified (Patiently waiting for Ted Kennedy's manslaughter trial for 36 years now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson