Is this his point to make that he believes that child rapists and other NAMBLA people ought to adopt chidren?
But if it were to pass my bet would be there would already be 4 votes to uphold it on our Supreme Court!
Isn't that cute. Comparing Republicans to homosexuals. Well, there is one comparison - one can choose to vote Republican or not, and one can choose to engage in same sex acts or refrain from doing so.
What a good way to expose himself for the idiot that he is.
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what's for dinner.
If Hagan meant to make himself look like an idiot, it's "Mission Accomplished"!
I admit that is funny.
``We need to see what we are doing,'' said Hagan, who called Hood's proposed bill blatantly discriminatory and extremely divisive. Hagan called Hood and the eight other conservative House Republicans who backed the anti-gay adoption bill ``homophobic.''
That is the liberal argument in a nutshell -people that choose to engage in homosexual activity and play house are special and must be provided children by the state -the liberals 'feel' that it is a right of all that choose to engage in homosexual activity and play house to raise children...
The liberals believe that those that choose to pursue an alternate self indulgent lifestyle not open to procreation -not open to creating life should have a procreative welfare system created that will hand out children to any who wish to play house...
The liberals tend to sweep aside the rights of innocent children and by implication treat children as a commodity or status symbol to be accquired much the same way they treat the unborn as a lump of flesh to be discarded...
Allowing children to be adopted by homosexuals playing house would actually mean doing violence to these children, in the sense that their condition of dependency would be used to place them in an environment that is not conducive to their full human development. Society long ago decided that it is the best interests of the child, as the weaker and more vulnerable party, that are to be the paramount consideration in every case.
Now it seems the judges in black robes want to contravene common law, actual legislation, and society in general and have the interests of homosexuals playing house be the paramount consideration in every case much the same way the judges in black robes created the paramount consideration of privacy in abortion...
If the media would ignore the buffoon, he'd simply disappear. Ah, well, he's a lifer, so I imagine the idiots who vote him into office year after year don't and won't know any better next time either.
Maybe we need a bill banning politician from wasting tax dollars on silly crap like this.
Maybe we need a bill banning politician from wasting tax dollars on silly crap like this.
Would some GOP elected official please take this bill from this man and start chasing him around the chamber smacking him on the head with it till some sense finally sinks into his noggin ?
Of course thats "tounge in cheek" of course.
Commander Janeway needs to revoke some shoar duty.