Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Darkwolf377

No. She was speaking to the South Bronx Overall Economic Development Corp., a group that would be SYMPATHETIC to vouchers. Hence my argument.

One thing to consider in weighing the possibilities: hillary clinton, not socialism, not the Democrat Party, is #1 for hillary clinton.


17 posted on 02/26/2006 8:57:07 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Mia T
Well in that case refer to my previous posts; she was trying to slant her position in such a way that, as I wrote, taking power away from the individual was seen as a good thing, that while they may have liked the idea of vouchers, it would enable evil white racists to take "their" tax money and use it for evil white racist schooling.

Her plantation, and you know what I'm talkin' about, idea is truly creepy. She's basically wagging her finger at the crowd and saying "You're too stupid to know you're supporting racism when you support vouchers."

21 posted on 02/26/2006 9:12:28 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (No respect for conservatives? That's free speech. No respect for liberals? That's hate speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson