Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kirkwood
I would say understanding my position might be helpful on your part. I did not come here to post support of GW. Doing that on this forum would be senseless. Rather, I thought this was a good forum to discuss the advisability of having political appointees make scientific decisions.
122 posted on 02/26/2006 8:31:11 PM PST by alumleg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: alumleg

"I would say understanding my position might be helpful on your part. I did not come here to post support of GW. Doing that on this forum would be senseless. Rather, I thought this was a good forum to discuss the advisability of having political appointees make scientific decisions."

And you got your answer. Everyone on FR knows that science is very politicized, but they know that it is politicized in the opposite direction from what you believe. Most of science is biased strongly to the left wing because scientists have this weird idea that democrats support their work more than republicans. In fact, republicans tend to support the sciences more than democrats, but they don't like seeing hard-earned tax dollars thrown down a black hole.


128 posted on 02/27/2006 8:41:29 AM PST by Kirkwood ("When the s*** hits the fan, there is enough for everyone.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson