1 posted on
02/26/2006 7:12:32 AM PST by
SandRat
To: SandRat
My guess is the F-22 will end up being deployed at Luke.
2 posted on
02/26/2006 7:14:28 AM PST by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
To: 2LT Radix jr; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; 80 Square Miles; A Ruckus of Dogs; acad1228; AirForceMom; ..
Raptor comes to Roost in Tucson!!!
3 posted on
02/26/2006 7:15:33 AM PST by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: SandRat
About 40 aircraft will take part in the training sessions, including historic warplanes such as the World War II-era P-51 Mustang and the F-86 Sabre, which was flown during the Korean War. Should be one hell of a show!
To: SandRat
there ought to be pictures...
7 posted on
02/26/2006 7:23:55 AM PST by
the invisib1e hand
("Who is it, really, making up your mind?")
To: SandRat
But some Tucsonans concerned about military-jet noise see the extra flights as an added headache and safety risk. LOL!
There's that moonbat term again, when writers are afraid to say "in my really stupid opinion"... , when they are about to say something mindless...
9 posted on
02/26/2006 7:26:06 AM PST by
Publius6961
(Multiculturalism is the white flag of a dying country)
To: SandRat
Before I read the article I thought "it would be really neat if they could use the "super cruise" feature all the way from their base in Virginia or Florida. (first wing is Langley AFB, Virginia, schoolhouse is Tyndall AFB in the Florida panhandle. That would mean they they'd be supersonic, but without use of afterburners. That would of course create a sonic boom, all the way across the US.
Then I read about some dingbat moaning about extra formation training being noisy. Once upon a time it was called the "sound of freedom". To many of us it still is. Then they compare the sound to a "nearby" (how nearby?) chainsaw, when the jet is 500 feet away. They won't be flying down that low much, and certainly not over the city, except of course when coming in to land or taking off. The sound diminishes by 6 dB for each doubling of the distance.
11 posted on
02/26/2006 7:54:02 AM PST by
El Gato
To: SandRat
National security requirements are one thing. Practicing for air shows is another, said Daniel Patterson, city planning commissioner. "I'm not sure it's appropriate to have all these additional overflights in a big city. It seems like it would be more appropriate for a remote location,"
I have to agree with him there. Far better that any training accidents happen over open desert.
FWIW, I was raised on Marine Corps airbases, I love the sound of jets.
13 posted on
02/26/2006 8:00:40 AM PST by
null and void
(Imagine what they would be doing if it wasn't a religion of peace!!!)
To: SandRat
You would think people like Daniel Patterson and the Tucsonans for Quality of Life etc. would be delighted to welcome these pilots and their planes but no, they conjure up selfish reasons why they shouldnt be here. Patterson is all too typical of the bureaucrats that have allowed residential housing, packed like sardines, to be built in such close proximity to Davis Monthan all for the love of the developer who they let write the rules to build anywhere and everywhere. Now they howl that the noise is environmentally incompatible.
Tucson is unique in quality weather for training our young men and women to fly these marvelous machines that keep our country free; to hear them complain is tiresome to say the least. If the city is dumb enough to allow homes to be build along and under flight patterns and people are stupid enough to buy the same, so be it - Davis Monthan is far more important than a few malcontents.
18 posted on
02/26/2006 8:08:03 AM PST by
yoe
To: SandRat
National security requirements are one thing. Practicing for air shows is another, said Daniel Patterson, city planning commissioner.
"I'm not sure it's appropriate to have all these additional overflights in a big city. It seems like it would be more appropriate for a remote location," said Patterson, who is also a co-chairman of Tucsonans for Quality of Life, a citizens group concerned about the environmental impact of the air base.
"For it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Chuck him out, the brute!
But it's "Saviour of 'is country," when the guns begin to shoot;"
- R. Kipling
To: SandRat
BTW, if this is for the "Heritage Flight" displays, then we aren't really talking about some kind of high speed, turn-n-burn maneuvering training. Heritage Flight displays put aircraft from multiple generations into the same formation for nice and gentle (and completely photogenic), crowd-pleasing flybys.
There are lots of pictures of these available out on the web by googling "heritage flight" ... but a good primer page can be found
here
To: SandRat
The newest bird in the Air Force fleet and one of the noisiest I would nominate the F-104 Starfighter as one of the noisiest in AF history. While TDY at Incirlik in the early 90's, the Turkish AF still operated F-104's and when the took off, you could literally feel it in your gut.
To: SandRat
Weren't those F-22s that did a fly-by prior to the start of the Daytona 500 last week?
33 posted on
02/26/2006 8:50:15 AM PST by
JoeGar
To: SandRat
Thats not noise...it is the sound of freedom....
42 posted on
02/26/2006 9:34:18 AM PST by
thinking
To: SandRat
"...said Patterson, who is also a co-chairman of Tucsonans for Quality of Life, a citizens group concerned about the environmental impact of the air base"Yeah, slick. Shut that base down, then......and watch the effect on your local economy, nimrod (absolutely guarantee he's a Democrat).
Talk about yer "environmental impact"........
To: SandRat
And remember, the YF-22 was half a mach slower than one of the tested versions of the YF-23, and also had significantly higher RCS than the YF-23.
50 posted on
02/26/2006 10:27:23 AM PST by
Donald Meaker
(You don't drive a car looking through the rear view mirror, but you do practice politics that way.)
To: SandRat
He said the air-show training heaps one more aggravation onto residents already negatively affected by things like extra helicopter flights and on-again, off-again night training at D-M.
I feel soooooo sorry for these poor sensitive people. < /sarcasm>
I live close to a civilian airport and not far from Langley Air Force Base and they have the Raptor assigned. I do occasionally hear the planes but it doesnt bother me a bit. Im glad theyre up and flying.
70 posted on
02/26/2006 11:48:10 AM PST by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: SandRat
78 posted on
02/26/2006 12:43:06 PM PST by
knews_hound
(Now with two handed typing !)
To: SandRat
A majority of Tucson residents ain't gonna like the Raptor -- Pima County, of which Tucson is a part always goes heavily DemonKat.
Send them right on up to Luke AFB, on the edge of the Phoenix Metro area, and Maricopa County, which wipes out the Pima County vote and always swings the state to the Republican side. They are welcome here!
We like seeing our military jets here in Phoenix, and we do see them regularly !!
79 posted on
02/26/2006 12:48:49 PM PST by
Babu
To: SandRat
Thought you might enjoy - A bud of mine sent me this pic a few weeks ago - One of our Rhinos (F-18) getting the best of a Raptor...with guns to boot -
To: SandRat
". . .will make its Tucson debut next weekend."
For deployment at Davis-Mothan AFB near the People's Republic of Tucson?
What a waste of machinery.
103 posted on
04/06/2006 6:19:07 PM PDT by
righttackle44
(The most dangerous weapon in the world is a Marine with his rifle and the American people behind him)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson