Actually what that first line means is that Bill Clinton, for good or for ill, had genuine charisma and likability. He wasn't a good person but he sure was good at persuading the public.
Hillary has none of that, which in my view dooms her candidacy. The candidate best at self-expression generally wins the election. Think that's wrong because of George W Bush? Wrong; you know that when W says something, he means it. Against incredibly weak opposition - Gore and Kerry were both inept orators - that was enough.
D
Slick never got anywhere near 50% of the vote. The left-wing rats and a few numb-skull independents elected him and we are still paying for his worthless, incompentent, treasonous presidency.