Skip to comments.
Vanity Fair's Photo Finagling
The Smoking Gun...Vanity Fair ^
| FEBRUARY 2
Posted on 02/25/2006 7:31:48 AM PST by george76
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-104 next last
To: george76
That is another wonderful Arnett (Fake but Accurate) picture.
Somebody needs to photoshop a "Baby Milk Factory" sign on the building behind Arnett!
61
posted on
02/25/2006 8:18:29 AM PST
by
rolling_stone
(Question Authority!)
To: Richard Kimball
I think under fair use, they have a defense. You also need The Jack, and your own Federal Judge to boot...
62
posted on
02/25/2006 8:18:37 AM PST
by
an amused spectator
(Bush Runner! The Donkey is after you! Bush Runner! When he catches you, you're through!)
To: george76
If the photo was published in the December issue of Vanity Fair, I'd be interested to know if the January of February issues had a letter-to-the-editor or other notice from Petah Ahnett pointing out the fraud.
Of course, being an old fraud himself, I'm sure Petah just shrugged and went back to collating his collection of pin-up photos of Christiane Amanpour.
Leni
63
posted on
02/25/2006 8:19:04 AM PST
by
MinuteGal
(Sail the Bounding Main to the Balmy, Palmy Caribbean on FReeps Ahoy 4. Register Now!)
To: Old Sarge
Do you know of a way to copy and paste into HTML a copy of a graphic in PDF?
64
posted on
02/25/2006 8:19:21 AM PST
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: george76
There's no reason the fictional stories propagated by the dying media shouldn't be accompanied by faked-up photographs. You know the old saying, "One picture is worth a thousand lies."
65
posted on
02/25/2006 8:22:11 AM PST
by
IronJack
To: Bon mots
When I was in jr high...back when schools were schools....
I remember the stuff on Stalin deleting Trotsky from pictures, adding himself, working himself into pictures and meetings
were he wasn't.
The more things change...
To: theFIRMbss
are you guys playing fizzbin?
67
posted on
02/25/2006 8:24:18 AM PST
by
isom35
To: SandyInSeattle
You're right. Arnett is most obvious, because he's out of scale, the light is different, and they didn't even bother to slip some photo element in front of him. It also looks like they just faded from the brick sidewalk to the gravel where he's standing. However, the whole photo looks like a collage.
To: Old Professer
I could be mistaken, but if you save the .pdf as a .GIF or a .jpg, you can then put it into HTML.
A screen capture off Powerpoint has always been successful for me.
69
posted on
02/25/2006 8:28:18 AM PST
by
Old Sarge
(In a Hole in the Ground, there Lived a Fobbit...)
To: Old Sarge
I agree. He is too big compared to the other people in the photo. It is silly looking, like he is in the land of small people.
70
posted on
02/25/2006 8:29:07 AM PST
by
sportutegrl
(People who say, "All I know is . . ." really mean, "All I want you to focus on is . . .")
To: george76
I wonder why Dan Rather isn't in the photo. He was Saigon bureau chief for SeeBS back in the 60s.
To: Old Sarge
Thanks; all I have to do now is learn how to use Powerpoint, I guess.
72
posted on
02/25/2006 8:32:15 AM PST
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: Richard Kimball
"the whole photo looks like a collage..."
They are earning, while they are learning.
73
posted on
02/25/2006 8:32:50 AM PST
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: texasbluebell
74
posted on
02/25/2006 8:41:36 AM PST
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
They should have 'shopped Rather into the photo as well to complete the con. In for a penny, in for a pound.
To: wardaddy
You are so right about women's magazines.
I never read them and haven't for years. But one day I took my mother-in-law to a hair salon and sat and read one. I forget which one it was, one of the run-of-the-mill ones.
There was a little quiz about what kinds of couples have the best sex. The answer was, Lesbian couples.
I couldn't believe it.
To: george76
VF jumped the shark when Graydon Carter went mentally ill over Iraq. From about 1997-2003, it was at the top of American magazines.
77
posted on
02/25/2006 9:16:12 AM PST
by
denydenydeny
("Osama... made the mistake of confusing media conventional wisdom with reality" (Mark Steyn))
To: denydenydeny
I agree with that. You still find an occasional can't-miss article -- Hitchens writes for them, after all! -- but Carter's moonbattery has really infected the magazine. By the way, for those unfamiliar, Vanity Fair isn't a "women's magazine" -- more like a New Yorker or Esquire.
78
posted on
02/25/2006 9:23:13 AM PST
by
JennysCool
(Islam: Scientology with Scimitars.)
To: george76
Fake, but accurate. Trademark MSM
79
posted on
02/25/2006 9:47:23 AM PST
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(A Liberal: One who demands half of your pie, because he didn't bake one.)
To: Grampa Dave
I knew it was fake the minute I didn't see Jane Fonda and Effin Kerry.
80
posted on
02/25/2006 9:50:43 AM PST
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(A Liberal: One who demands half of your pie, because he didn't bake one.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-104 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson