Skip to comments.
Vanity Fair's Photo Finagling
The Smoking Gun...Vanity Fair ^
| FEBRUARY 2
Posted on 02/25/2006 7:31:48 AM PST by george76
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: Richard Kimball
No problem. I posted it before I saw that #2 had been removed and was going to ping you, as I figured it was a copyright thing.Got a link to where one could go to see it?
41
posted on
02/25/2006 8:00:25 AM PST
by
Pusterfuss
(Proud member: Minnesotans for Global Warming)
To: Pusterfuss
Try the link provided in #1. Scroll down just a bit, it's as the bottom of the story on Smoking Gun.
42
posted on
02/25/2006 8:01:14 AM PST
by
MizSterious
(Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
To: Pusterfuss
There's always the usual link at the top of the thread! :-)
43
posted on
02/25/2006 8:01:35 AM PST
by
JennysCool
(Islam: Scientology with Scimitars.)
To: george76
Not much media coverage of this while hundreds of stories on the nude actresses on Vanity Fair's cover.
44
posted on
02/25/2006 8:01:48 AM PST
by
gondramB
(Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and unto God that which is God's.)
To: reagan_fanatic
The DUmmies are not even good at photoshop.
No wonder that they continue to make fools of themselves.
45
posted on
02/25/2006 8:02:13 AM PST
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: MizSterious
Try the link provided in #1. Scroll down just a bit, it's as the bottom of the story on Smoking Gun.Duh!!! My bad, sorry.
46
posted on
02/25/2006 8:02:25 AM PST
by
Pusterfuss
(Proud member: Minnesotans for Global Warming)
To: Richard Kimball; Admin Moderator
I wonder if China is taking notes from the REAL pros on how to deal with that pesky ol' Internet.
"didn't do it, didn't see me do it, can't prove I did it"*
*I can't help wondering if I've violated some sort of copyright by posting that quote...
47
posted on
02/25/2006 8:03:22 AM PST
by
an amused spectator
(Bush Runner! The Donkey is after you! Bush Runner! When he catches you, you're through!)
To: Admin Moderator
Better?
To: Grampa Dave
The picture was taken at night. I don't see high contrast shadows like you would with flash photograpy. I would'nt be suprized if Peter wasn't the only on photoshopped.
To: george76
Vanity Fair much like any current rag directed at chicks has a writing and editorial staff that would be better served at Mother Jones or the Nation.
The crap women's mags spew is incredibly lefty.
I think the average contributor is a Gen Z fembot Bush hater from Sarah Lawrence up the road.....ugly and angry selling fantasies to womyn.....
so full of paradox and hypocrisy
Lesbican Annie does take fine "portraitures" though...I'll give her that.
50
posted on
02/25/2006 8:05:44 AM PST
by
wardaddy
(God Bless South Dakota!)
To: an amused spectator
"didn't do it, didn't see me do it, can't prove I did it"And, you might add: "not only that, but even if you have proof, you can't make it public because we'll sue for copyright violation."
51
posted on
02/25/2006 8:05:47 AM PST
by
MizSterious
(Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
To: Pusterfuss
It's gone. It wasn't anything special. I just photoshopped Cartman into the group photo. Personally, I thought he looked more real than Arnett did.
To: Pusterfuss
53
posted on
02/25/2006 8:06:16 AM PST
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: MizSterious
Hmmph to Conde Nast--but I note that the link to Smoking Gun works, and they have the pic. Get it while it's hot! They'll prolly be getting a cease-and-desist on Monday. ;-)
54
posted on
02/25/2006 8:06:47 AM PST
by
an amused spectator
(Bush Runner! The Donkey is after you! Bush Runner! When he catches you, you're through!)
To: Richard Kimball
RK, you just figured out how to make Peter Arnett toast.
55
posted on
02/25/2006 8:08:26 AM PST
by
an amused spectator
(Bush Runner! The Donkey is after you! Bush Runner! When he catches you, you're through!)
To: Admin Moderator
Thanks for letting us know the reason a post was removed.
One sometimes wonders...
56
posted on
02/25/2006 8:09:11 AM PST
by
Redbob
To: an amused spectator
I think under fair use, they have a defense. They're running the photo with the photoshopping as the story. We could probably make the same case, but I don't think FR wants to deal with being in court hourly.
To: Richard Kimball
That is another wonderful Arnett (Fake but Accurate) picture.
58
posted on
02/25/2006 8:10:15 AM PST
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: george76
How sloppy. They all look like they're in front of a blue background with a shot of Vietnam added later.
59
posted on
02/25/2006 8:14:34 AM PST
by
Not A Snowbird
(Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
To: george76
This reminds me of the photoshop job on OJ. The old media is up to it's old tricks again.
60
posted on
02/25/2006 8:17:16 AM PST
by
DocRock
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson