| Humans vs. Neanderthals: Game Over Earlier |
||
| Posted by SunkenCiv On General/Chat 02/23/2006 1:25:12 AM EST · 16 replies · 239+ views LiveScience | 22 February 2006 | Associated Press Humans and Neanderthals, thought to have coexisted for 10,000 years across the whole of Europe, are more likely to have lived at the same time for only 6,000 years, the new study suggests. Scientists believe the two species could have lived side by side at specific sites for periods of only about 2,000 years, but Mellars claims they would have lived in competition at each site for only 1,000 years... Two new studies of stratified radiocarbon in the Cariaco Basin, near Venezuela, and of radiocarbon on fossilized coral formations in the tropical Atlantic and Pacific have given scientists a better... |
||
|
|
||
| Modern humans took over Europe in just 5,000 years |
||
| Posted by S0122017 On News/Activism 02/23/2006 7:20:40 AM EST · 13 replies · 460+ views www.nature.com/news | 22 February 2006 | Michael Hopkin Published online: 22 February 2006; | doi:10.1038/news060220-11 Better bone dates reveal bad news for Neanderthals Modern humans took over Europe in just 5,000 years. Michael Hopkin These drawings from the Chauvet cave were originally dated to around 31,000 years ago. But a new analysis pushes that back four or five thousand years. © Nature, with permission from the French Ministry of Culture and Communication. Advances in the science of radiocarbon dating - a common, but oft-maligned palaeontological tool - have narrowed down the overlap between Europe's earliest modern humans and the Neanderthals that preceded them. Refinements to the technique, which... |
||
|
|
||
| Modern humans 'blitzed Europe'(Radiocarbon Dating Development) |
||
| Posted by nickcarraway On News/Activism 02/23/2006 1:22:51 PM EST · 21 replies · 671+ views The Telegraph (U.K.) | 23/02/2006 | Roger Highfield Our ancestors colonised Europe and wiped out their Neanderthal cousins even faster than we thought, says a study published today. Argument has raged for years about whether our ancestors from Africa outsurvived, killed or bred with the Neanderthals, who were stronger, bulkier and shorter but had equally large brains. Now developments in radiocarbon dating suggest that many of the dates published over the past 40 years are likely to underestimate the true ages of the samples. Prof Paul Mellars, of the University of Cambridge, describes today in the journal Nature how better calibration of radiocarbon ages have led to revisions... |
||
