The part of the paper that had rehashed what seems to be accepted knowledge--I left out since it was already (in one form or another) mentioned. For me, the key was the evidence of the mixed fossil boy found in Iberia and Wolpoff's comments.
Umm.. No. The part you call "rehashed" was actually the whole crux of the article. The part you decided to post was the "fringe" dispute by the multi-regional theorists.