Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AntiGuv
Concur with your point on rape except for the exception of holding the women. Why would the human tribes not hold the Neanderthal women, like other conquered tribe's women?

Well, perhaps they were so anti-social (like animals) or unskilled that they couldn't be kept. This is what I mean by stronger differences than simply "social norms" as we apply them to human groupings.

160 posted on 02/25/2006 7:54:54 AM PST by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]


To: SampleMan

I don't know. Maybe the human tribes did not hold the Neanderthal women because they were just too butt ugly to look at every day. Or maybe they just didn't feel like sharing their food with them. My guess is because there's no reason to bring the (butt ugly) cow home when you can get the milk for free. But whatever the answer, the fact remains that we do not find mixed communities in the archeaological record.


161 posted on 02/25/2006 7:58:14 AM PST by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

To: SampleMan

PS. And it probably wouldn't be all that great having an unintelligible butt ugly cow around bites and kicks and bashes your head in with a stone when you fall asleep.


162 posted on 02/25/2006 8:03:14 AM PST by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson