To: BenLurkin
Is it really that hard to start a fire? The brilliance is that the developer will rebuild the burned structure using twice as much natural resources as would otherwise have been needed. The fire will give off toxic greenhouse gases resulting in catostrophic global warming. Construction workers will commute twice as much to and from the job site burning ever more fossil fuels. Another classic example of the liberal mindset accomplishing the exact opposite of the intended result.
8 posted on
02/24/2006 9:47:38 PM PST by
willyd
To: willyd
Ah, but you're not factoring in the ''greater good'' so beloved of the nihilist/statist mindset. Y'see, a little global warming is OK, as long as it helps destroy eeeevil capitalists who exploit innocent trees and such. Gaia approves of this, dontcha know...
Pardon my retching, please.
'^)
23 posted on
02/24/2006 10:41:32 PM PST by
SAJ
To: willyd
Is it really that hard to start a fire? The brilliance is that the developer will rebuild the burned structure using twice as much natural resources as would otherwise have been needed. The fire will give off toxic greenhouse gases resulting in catostrophic global warming. Construction workers will commute twice as much to and from the job site burning ever more fossil fuels. Another classic example of the liberal mindset accomplishing the exact opposite of the intended result. That can't be true. ELF would never do something to harm the environment. I understand they are even recycling waste products from the Exxon Valdeez clean up to make their firebombs. --end sarcasm.
Seriously though, I'd be really surprised if more than a small few of the members of ELF really even care about the environment. I have a feeling for most of them, anarchy is the big draw for joining groups like this and committing the acts they do.
29 posted on
02/25/2006 12:24:37 AM PST by
JavaTheHutt
( Gun Control - The difference between Lexington Green and Tienanmen Square.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson