Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer
"Respect for the human embryo from the moment of conception, he said, is an "ethically sustainable position supported by scientific data and philosophical reasoning.""

"The academy chose to look specifically at embryos before implantation, which begins to occur about seven days after fertilization and is complete by 14 days after fertilization, because some scientists and ethicists insist that pregnancy does not begin until the embryo is implanted in the uterus."

There's no controversy---both are correct. The embryo is fully human from conception, and pregnancy starts with implantation. If technology existed to extract the embryo prior to implantation and support it with nutrients and so forth, at the end of nine months, you'd have a baby.

10 posted on 02/24/2006 12:47:50 PM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Wonder Warthog

I agree with you that the current distinction between "conception" and "pregnancy" is not significant as to the moral status of the human embryo during the first two weeks of his or her new little life.

"Pregnancy" was defined by the American Medical Association and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology as beginning at the initial union of sperm and egg, i.e. fertilization, until 1965. It was after a series of interactions between the AMA, AACOG, the Population Council, and Planned Parenthood regarding birth control and the "population explosion" that the physician's groups chose to modify their definitions.
Following is a list of materials that document the change in terminology:

Dr. Mary Calderone, discussion, Mechanisms of Contraceptive Action," in Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices: Proceedings of the Conference, held April 30-May 1, 1962, New York City, ed. C. Tietze and S. Lewitt, published by Excerpta Medica Foundation, 110.

Sybil Meloy, "Pre-Implantation Fertility Control and the Abortion Law," Chicago- Kent Law Review, vol. 41 (1964): 183, 205-06. Planned Parenthood recognized in its amicus brief for Roe v. Wade that criminal abortion laws could be applied to the IUD because of its potential to prevent implantation. PPFA its physician group (APPP) Amicus brief on page 44 cited Cybil Meloy, and also said that prosecutors had not used state anti-abortion laws to outlaw the use of IUD's.

Abraham Stone, M.D., "Research in Contraception: A Review and Preview," presented at the Third International Conference of Planned Parenthood, Bombay, India Report of the Proceedings, November 24-29, 1952, no copyright, Family Planning Association of India, 101.

A Survey of Research on Reproduction Related to Birth and Population Control (as of January 1, 1963) US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, page 27.

Memo to Dr. Drill from Dr. Saunders, re: "Effects of Drugs on Mating in Rats," 12/9/54, Gregory Pincus Papers, Manuscript Division, Library of Congress; Abraham Stone, The Control of Fertility, Scientific American, April, 1954, vol. 190., no. 4, 31-33.

Bent Boving, "Implantation Mechanisms," in Mechanisms Concerned with Conception, ed. C. G. Hartman (New York: Pergamon Press, 1963), 386. Boving acknowledged (p. 321): "... the greatest pregnancy wastage, in fact, by far the highest death rate of the entire human life span, is during the week before and including the beginning of implantation, and the next greatest is in the week immediately following."

Proceedings of the Second International Conference, Intra-Uterine Contraception, held October 2-3, 1964, New York City, ed. Sheldon Segal, et al.., International Series, Excerpta Medica Foundation, No. 86, page 212.

ACOG Terminology Bulletin, Terms Used in Reference to the Fetus, Chicago, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, No. 1, September 1965.

Dr. Richard Sosnowski, head of the Southern Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists "The Pursuit of Excellence: Have We Apprehended and Comprehended It?" American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 150. No. 2 (September 15, 1984) 117.


15 posted on 02/24/2006 2:30:11 PM PST by Im4LifeandLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Wonder Warthog


"There's no controversy---both are correct. The embryo is fully human from conception, and pregnancy starts with implantation. If technology existed to extract the embryo prior to implantation and support it with nutrients and so forth, at the end of nine months, you'd have a baby."

I'd say pregnancy starts with fertilization - that unimplanted embryo is already putting out HCG - sending the message: here I come, keep making progesterone and get everything ready for me! It changes the mother's body even before implantation.

Mrs VS


18 posted on 02/24/2006 2:38:33 PM PST by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson