If you can call me an arab sympathiser, I can call you whatever I want too.
My dad can beat up your dad.
(what did you do after you pulled up my sign up date? Probably ruined your whole "you are a newbie" strategy.)
LOL
You flatter yourself. (Some surprise, for one who calls themself the "central scrutiniser" and misspells scrutinizer.)
I've never called anyone a "newbie", and could care less when you or anyone else registered. Particularly since I've changed screen names several times since shortly after this forum first appeared according to what I wanted it to say, and therefore am well aware that how long a name has been registered often means nothing.
I gather from your interest that you take part in that ritual often seen on FR of presenting oneself as an insider who has approval power over newer posters.
Obviously your capacity for reasoning is limited, and life is short, so this will be my last post to you, as engaging as our little banter has been.
The message you wish to convey, as confirmed by your posts, with your screen name--mispelling notwithstanding--is that you consider yourself capable of superior scrutiny---which on this thread you've shown includes not only which "religions" warrant "hate" and "bashing" (Scientology) and which do not (Islam)-- but also where and how these views are to be expressed.
You go ahead and knock yourself out with your grandiose delusions of the value of your perspectives. But if you're going to continue to believe your superiority gives you the authority to dictate that someone's views are not welcome simply because they're inconvenient to you, you'd do well to limit that behavior to the relative safety of cyberspace.
I imagine you've already been taught that lesson in the real, physical world, though. Little punks who think they're much smarter than they are usually are, sooner or later.