To: r9etb
There are people involved, making decisions that are almost never entirely rational; and quite often making their decisions based on fundamentally irrational impulses. Yes, but it is freemarketeers who are irrational. If you have choice between having modest food on the table, modest roof over your head, very basic medical care and education for your children or having only "free" market system with "free" press you will chose the first.
Socialism with human face is better than capitalism without human face.
25 posted on
02/24/2006 7:25:42 AM PST by
A. Pole
(In 2001 top 5% owned 60% of national wealth, while bottom 60% owned 4%)
To: A. Pole
Socialism with human face is better than capitalism without human face.Da, comrade.
31 posted on
02/24/2006 7:50:05 AM PST by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
To: A. Pole
Just curious; where is capitalism currently operating "without a human face"?
35 posted on
02/24/2006 7:59:06 AM PST by
Sam's Army
(Another unsuccessful attempt to refrain from posting)
To: A. Pole
Socialism with human face is better than capitalism without human face. I can find a lot of examples of capitalism with a human face. I can not find any of socialism with a human face. Every time socialism is tried, it deteroirates into an Orwellian nightmare where everyone is equal but some are more equal than others.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson