Skip to comments.
Ted Koppel in 'NYT': Iraq for U.S. Is 'About the Oil'
Editor & Publisher ^
| 02/24/2006
Posted on 02/24/2006 5:35:01 AM PST by GeneD
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
See what you miss when you don't have Times Select?
1
posted on
02/24/2006 5:35:03 AM PST
by
GeneD
To: GeneD
Ted Koppel? Didn't he used to be big in television? Or did the pictures just get small?
2
posted on
02/24/2006 5:38:10 AM PST
by
abb
(Because News Reporting is too important to be left to the Journalists.)
To: GeneD
3
posted on
02/24/2006 5:38:38 AM PST
by
Fintan
(See??? Sometimes I do read the articles.)
To: GeneD
Who was in control of that oil before we set it to be free on the open market?
Wasn't it the UN, and that Oil for rotten Food profiteers?
Teddy Teddy you are not filling in all the blanks, and yes Russia and France are still ticked about alllll that Oil for rotten Food contracts they lost out on.
To: GeneD
Ted is partly right. The war in Iraq is partly about oil, or, more specifically, the free flow thereof. Oil is the lynch pin that binds our economy together. Since there is no other viable energy source to replace it (yet), without oil we would be back to the horse and buggy days. I wonder if Mr. Koppel would prefer to go back to riding a horse instead of driving his SUV?
To: GeneD
If Iraq is about the oil, then Korea must be about the rice.......
6
posted on
02/24/2006 5:40:15 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him...)
To: GeneD
"
... Ted Koppel, the former "Nightline" host who is ..." still trying to be relevant.

7
posted on
02/24/2006 5:41:38 AM PST
by
G.Mason
(Duty, Honor, Country)
To: GeneD
So what, Ted. It's our oil, regardless of the coincidence that a culture of ignorant, 7th century primitives sit on top of it.
8
posted on
02/24/2006 5:41:44 AM PST
by
angkor
To: GeneD
See what you miss when you don't have Times Select? LOL! I haven't read a Times Select article since they came out, and I can feel my mind withering... NOT
I've got a concept: Would that Teddy "Bad Hair Lifetime" Koppel devote his massive brainpower to a like expose of the taxation structure in the United States.
I won't hold my breath. ;-)
9
posted on
02/24/2006 5:45:42 AM PST
by
an amused spectator
(Bush Runner! The Donkey is after you! Bush Runner! When he catches you, you're through!)
To: Red Badger
If Iraq is about the oil, then Korea must be about the rice....... And WWI & WWII was about the Brie!
10
posted on
02/24/2006 5:46:05 AM PST
by
TexGuy
To: Fintan
And Koppel wonders why they retired him from ABC!?!
11
posted on
02/24/2006 5:47:40 AM PST
by
harpu
( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
To: GeneD
"He likened the situation to H.L. Mencken's statement that when someone says something is "not about the money" it is indeed "about the money."
It's not about Ted Koppel being a schmuck.
12
posted on
02/24/2006 5:48:55 AM PST
by
BadAndy
(The DemocRATs are the enemy's most effective weapon.)
To: Thermalseeker
I feel that the invasion of Iraq was precipitated by the WOT and the threat of Saddam to world stability.
Now that includes oil for sure, but our safety and the future of the free remains the #1 reason we went there. Ted is mouthing the liberal wacko's war cry of the years.
I've heard this from my hippie friends for ever! ...as if oil being available in a steady flow at a reasonable price was this huge bogey man.
To the ultra liberal, all one must say is "Oil" to summarize all that is wrong with America.
13
posted on
02/24/2006 5:48:59 AM PST
by
ThirstyMan
(hysteria: the elixir of the Left that trumps all reason)
To: GeneD
Uhhhhhh, Ted....have you ever looked at a map? Anyone with even a ounce of knowledge of military history needs only to glance at a map to recognize the geographic strategic value of Iraq as a base of operations in the middle east. Even if it didn't have a drop of oil, Iraq is easily the most obvious place one would want to establislh a presence to fight the war against extremist islamists.
14
posted on
02/24/2006 5:49:42 AM PST
by
joebuck
To: Thermalseeker
Now don't start comparing him to Mr. Ed.
15
posted on
02/24/2006 5:50:49 AM PST
by
carumba
(The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made. Groucho)
To: GeneD
, "If those considerations did not enter into the Bush administration's calculations when the president ordered the invasion of Iraq in 2003, it would have been the first time in more than 50 years that the uninterrupted flow of Persian Gulf oil was not a central element of American foreign policy." BINGO Ted! Its alwasys been about the oil! It was about the oil when we started the Cold War! And when we went to Vietnam! It was about the oil in Granada! It was about the oil in Bosnia! Yes nothing but oil oil oil for the last 50 years!
16
posted on
02/24/2006 5:54:48 AM PST
by
Bommer
(Have you insulted a prophet today? http://pages.sbcglobal.net/bommer/mofactor.html)
To: GeneD
the U.S. adventure in Iraq is, as some charge, "about the oilIf that were the case, we could have saved a fortune on airfare & invaded Canada or Mexico.
17
posted on
02/24/2006 5:55:20 AM PST
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: GeneD
Sure...it's about a the oil, Ted. And about a million other things that apparently don't suit your agenda in this Op-Ed piece in a DNC propaganda rag.
Anyone with an IG above a ham sandwich can see through Koppel's BS.
18
posted on
02/24/2006 5:55:57 AM PST
by
in hoc signo vinces
("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis. American gals are worth fighting for!")
To: in hoc signo vinces
ooppp...that's IQ...hahahahaha...mine isnt so high without a cup of coffee in the morning.
19
posted on
02/24/2006 5:56:49 AM PST
by
in hoc signo vinces
("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis. American gals are worth fighting for!")
To: GeneD
Ted Koppel? The Hairpiece? Times Select - saving us from accidentally stumbling across their great editorials!
20
posted on
02/24/2006 5:59:39 AM PST
by
Rummyfan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson