To: PatrickHenry
I didn't know that natural selection was ever in doubt.
9 posted on
02/24/2006 4:26:54 AM PST by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: bill1952
12 posted on
02/24/2006 4:28:29 AM PST by
Paladin2
(If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
To: bill1952
What we have here is yet another rhetorical device designed to demonstrate a scientific truth for which there is no reliable bench test.
Best I can figure it, these guys are into "just say it's so" mode. In fact, the talk about underlying mechanism suggests they are not too sold on the idea that DNA exists.
This is the sort of logic that is used to argue that there are thousands of species of salmon.
21 posted on
02/24/2006 4:53:28 AM PST by
muawiyah
(-)
To: bill1952
I didn't know that natural selection was ever in doubt. Same here.
[This study, however] provides empirical support for the proposition that natural selection is a general force behind the formation of new species by analyzing the relationship between natural selection and the ability to interbreed...
The study provides more empirical support.
40 posted on
02/24/2006 5:25:48 AM PST by
phantomworker
(You are the only person who defines you: Begins & ends with you-Go to the mirror & see for yourself)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson