Posted on 02/23/2006 8:21:58 PM PST by Carl/NewsMax
What is a "top product"? Are you saying that pound for pound nuclear reactors are shipped more than other products? Or are you saying that the most expensive things shipped are nuclear reactors? Pretty vague article.
It's newsmax, take it with a grain of salt.
I see, so the Dubai Ports will steal the nuclear reactors and deliver it to Iran, Syria, or a terrorist group (extreme sarcasm)! Man how stupid do you think people are to buy your idiotic inference here?!
Oh no. The N word. The terrorists will now be shipping nukes through our ports. (sarcasm)
You know, I had no idea we were shipping thousands of nuclear reactors all over the world. In fact, I thought the only thing we were exporting anymore was jobs to India. All kinds of amazing "facts" coming out of the folks who oppose this deal.
www.insc.anl.gov/pwrmaps/map/north_america.php
We ship 10 times as many as we have out of the country. Just a SWAG based on the numbers of processed each year from this article, approx. 7,600 ships. Must be more than that if it's making it to the top two products. Amazing.
I do believe post #2 on this thread was pretty succinct and on the mark.
Again I think we are getting some hype from somewhere. Wonder if we are getting some smoke blown with with the facts.
well go back 3 days and imagine this thread posted and imagine some of the responses......
who is stupid, then?
"First reports are usually wrong" Don Rumsfeld
Actually, I'm leaning towards supporting the Dubai deal - since it looks like the UAE is a far more important strategic ally than most of us knew just a few days ago.
For those curious, here's the URL for the Newsday report. Export details are at the end.
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-usport234637992feb23,0,2019109.story
There must be one heck of a market for nuclear-powered jackets and hats.
Nuclear reactor kits don't include the 'batteries'. NewsMax is confusing nuclear reactors with nuclear fuel.
But the information you posted at the start of this thread implies Nuclear Reactors flow through these ports like Toyota's. Why would you want to make that false impression if you actually think the deal is legit? And with regard to the Newsday report...North Korea publishes less biased news articles. Here is the sub-headline...."White House says Bush was unaware of pending port sale, but legally required review was sidestepped." And then here is the very first sentence of the article..."The Bush administration put a Middle Eastern firm's deal to run U.S. seaports on a fast track to approval by sidestepping a legally authorized 45-day review" OK. Was it legally "required" or legally "authorized"? This stuff is trash, and your stuff usually isn't. What gives?
Products that are top. silly ;^)
shhhh, don't let the enviros know.
If we really want to increase our security deporting several hundred top Democrats would be the way to go.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.