Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lockheed: Florida best state to build new spacecraft
ALLISON GATLIN ^ | February 23, 2006. | ALLISON GATLIN

Posted on 02/23/2006 7:35:55 PM PST by BenLurkin

The Lockheed Martin-led team is competing with a joint project of Northrop Grumman Corp. and The Boeing Co. for the CEV contract, which NASA expects to award later this year.

"We are extremely pleased and proud to partner with the state of Florida in support of NASA's CEV program. The point of final assembly and testing for each mission will be critical to the viability of NASA's CEV program and the ideal location to do that is here in Florida adjacent to the launch site," said John Karas, vice president of space exploration for Lockheed. Other locations for the company's CEV program have not yet been announced.

"Florida has an extremely talented existing work force with the skills, experience, dedication and track record to meet the challenges and requirements of NASA's human spaceflight program. They also have facilities that can support the highly specialized work that the new Crew Exploration Vehicle will require. And co-location here in Florida with NASA's launch operations offers the greatest value at an overall affordable cost that is essential to the long-term success, safety, reliability and sustainability of NASA's CEV program," Karas said.

The Northrop Grumman team has not said where work will be performed, should it win the contract. That information - how the program will be implemented - is deemed part of the competition and will be included in their proposal next month, said Northrop spokesman Brooks McKinney.

Florida's state government offered a $45.5 million incentive package to both contractor teams to lure the CEV work to the state, a fact Karas said played a role in his company's decision.

(Excerpt) Read more at avpress.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; US: California; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: aerospacevalley; allisongatlin; antelopevalley; cev; florida; lockheed

1 posted on 02/23/2006 7:35:57 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Crew Exploration Vehicle ping.
2 posted on 02/23/2006 7:40:30 PM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

3 posted on 02/23/2006 7:42:19 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Very nice. Thanks!


4 posted on 02/23/2006 7:43:21 PM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
PR Newswire 2-22-06

Lockheed Martin Announces Partnership With the State of Florida to Pursue NASA's New Crew Exploration Vehicle

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla., Feb. 22 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) announced today, in partnership with the State of Florida, its plans to locate final assembly and testing of the Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) in Florida if the corporation is successful in its bid to provide the next generation crew transportation system for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

The CEV, an advanced blunt-body crew capsule design, is a key element of NASA's Vision for Space Exploration, and will transport up to six crew members to and from the International Space Station and up to four crew members for lunar missions, to Mars and beyond.

Lockheed Martin, as prime contractor, is leading a team that is competing to help NASA develop and produce a CEV that will be safer, more reliable and more cost-effective than previous human spaceflight systems. As NASA retires its venerable Space Shuttle system in 2010, the new Crew Exploration Vehicle will carry forward the next generation of astronauts to Earth orbit, back to the moon and on to farther destinations.

"We are extremely pleased and proud to partner with the State of Florida in support of NASA's CEV program. The point of final assembly and testing for each mission will be critical to the viability of NASA's CEV program and the ideal location to do that is here in Florida adjacent to the launch site," said John Karas, vice president of space exploration for Lockheed Martin.

"Florida has an extremely talented existing workforce with the skills, experience, dedication and track record to meet the challenges and requirements of NASA's human spaceflight program. They also have facilities that can support the highly specialized work that the new Crew Exploration Vehicle will require. And co-location here in Florida with NASA's launch operations offers the greatest value at an overall affordable cost that is essential to the long-term success, safety, reliability and sustainability of NASA's CEV program," added Karas.

In support of the State of Florida's extensive heritage in NASA's space flight endeavors and the state's strong interest in maintaining a key role in NASA's CEV program, Governor Jeb Bush has proposed incentives valued at $45.5 million for the CEV program to cover training, transportation infrastructure, facility improvements and equipment.

"On behalf of the State of Florida, I am very pleased that Lockheed Martin has recognized our strong commitment to maintaining our space industry legacy," said Lt. Gov. Toni Jennings. "We are proud to partner with them by providing economic incentives to final assemble the Crew Exploration Vehicle right here at Kennedy Space Center, where space history begins and will continue for years to come."

In trade studies, Lockheed Martin looked closely at the significant benefits of using facilities located in Florida for final assembly, integration and subsystem checkout, environmental acceptance testing, and Crew Module maintenance, for both the CEV Crew Module and Service Module. The final assembly and integration will be located in the O&C facility located on- site at Kennedy Space Center (KSC), a state-of-the-art facility that will be specifically configured to support CEV final assembly and acceptance testing. Locating the final assembly and integration operations in proximity with the launch operations will provide much greater efficiency in the flow of testing and operations leading to launch. In addition, the synergies gained by utilizing KSC for assembly and integration will provide NASA with greater operational flexibility during the final integration of the CEV with the Crew Launch Vehicle.

5 posted on 02/23/2006 7:45:59 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I wish they'd build them in Palmdale.


6 posted on 02/23/2006 7:47:56 PM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

They should have done this with the Shuttle. Maybe if they had produced the boosters in Florida in one piece, and barged them to the launch site,instead of producing them in pieces in the home state (Utah) of the Senator (Garn) who was chairman of the committee that oversees appropriations for NASA (and flew on a shuttle in 1985), there wouldn't have been a disaster. Any rocket scientists out there? Might it have prevented the disaster?


7 posted on 02/23/2006 8:01:18 PM PST by LZ_Bayonet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

The launch vehicle looks like a glorified Mercury-Redstone, only with a bigger kick. The lift-off won't be as impressive as the shuttle or Saturn V, but it'll still be neat. Talk about going back to the future.


8 posted on 02/23/2006 8:01:51 PM PST by NCC-1701 (RADICAL ISLAM IS A CULT. IT MUST BE ELIMINATED FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
I wish they'd build them in Palmdale.

A major consideration with larger launch vehicles is the ability to transport them from the point of manufacture to the launch site. Transporting by highway limits the design since you are limited to the height of underpasses - rail has similar constraints. Building the launch vehicle close to the launch pad offers a lot of advantages.

9 posted on 02/23/2006 8:10:36 PM PST by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LZ_Bayonet

You make a good point. The shuttle solid rocket booster components are shipped by rail and their diameter is limited to the dimensional restraints of the tunnels, bridges, etc.. that they must pass through. It is probably desirable, however, to locate a solid fuel motor manufacturing facility in a remote location when possible ; >


10 posted on 02/23/2006 8:32:25 PM PST by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NCC-1701
"The launch vehicle looks like a glorified Mercury-Redstone, only with a bigger kick. The lift-off won't be as impressive as the shuttle or Saturn V, but it'll still be neat. Talk about going back to the future."

The heavy lift unmanned shuttle derivative will be an event and sure to dazzle though. The CEV rocket is only half the mission if its lunar or Mars bound.


11 posted on 02/23/2006 10:05:04 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson