Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans rally around DeLay in Houston [DeLay Scared of Tom Campbell (R-Sugar Land)]
Associated Press ^ | 02.23.2004 | WENDY BENJAMINSON

Posted on 02/23/2006 4:38:42 PM PST by SolidSupplySide

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: SolidSupplySide
I don't recall any DeLay supporters posting DeLay vs. Campbell threads and spinning them as anti-Campbell screeds, trying to make it look as if Campbells not in the lead. (No need to; Campbell's not on top). But there have been several DeLay vs. Campbell threads posted by the DeLay bashers in an attempt to make it look, no matter what the situation, that Campbell has some sort of a chance of winning. Major spin, very transparent, and not even spin that's well done. Wonder why the Campbell camp feels the need to do so? Maybe because those are the desperate attempts for attention by the underdogs, and Campbell's not doing so hot?
21 posted on 02/23/2006 7:13:33 PM PST by RedWhiteBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide

By the way, when I voted early this afternoon, there were 7 other cars in the parking lot of the early voting facility; all people there to vote (not poll workers). ALL SEVEN had DeLay stickers -- not a Campbell sticker in the bunch. A quick canvas in my subdivision (260 homes) revealed that all my neighbors that had DeLay signs in previous campaigns ALL had their DeLay signs out again. Only 1 Campbell yard sign out of 260 houses, and that home has never displayed any sort of campaign sign before. I figure it just must be someone that goes to church with him or something. I don't see ANY indication of significant erosion in support for DeLay. Anecdotal evidence, I know, but I get out a lot, talk a lot, and I see what is going on around here.


22 posted on 02/23/2006 7:21:40 PM PST by RedWhiteBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RedWhiteBlue
I don't recall any DeLay supporters posting DeLay vs. Campbell threads and spinning them as anti-Campbell screeds, trying to make it look as if Campbells not in the lead. (No need to; Campbell's not on top). But there have been several DeLay vs. Campbell threads posted by the DeLay bashers in an attempt to make it look, no matter what the situation, that Campbell has some sort of a chance of winning. Major spin, very transparent, and not even spin that's well done. Wonder why the Campbell camp feels the need to do so? Maybe because those are the desperate attempts for attention by the underdogs, and Campbell's not doing so hot?

Hey, I'm just supporting a Ronald Reagan Republican with character in a GOP primary. There's no need to get defensive.

Go Tom Campbell!

23 posted on 02/23/2006 7:22:47 PM PST by SolidSupplySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide

Funny! I post an observation and you accuse ME of becoming defensive! I've got no need to! My guy, Tom DeLay, is on top and is going to win the primary AND the congressional seat.


24 posted on 02/23/2006 7:25:41 PM PST by RedWhiteBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RedWhiteBlue
My guy, Tom DeLay, is on top and is going to win the primary AND the congressional seat.

That may be. DeLay has all the advantages of incumbancy. But I stand by my prediction. The more conservative part of the district, the higher percentage of votes Campbell will get.

25 posted on 02/23/2006 7:32:44 PM PST by SolidSupplySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: harpu
Well, here I am...

I won't post anything different than I haven't previously posted at one time or another...

There are two basic thoughts on Tom DeLay from two different camps.

1. He is a saint who has done nothing wrong, ever. The Democrats hate him and thats all there is to it. Anything wrong is just Democrats, as thought the R behind someone's name made them a saint already.

2. The other side of conservatives don't see it quite that way.

He isn't angelic, just like almost anyone in DC. In his case, he takes too much money from special interests primarily because he's been a fixture for so long.

While, yeah he's Republican etc etc... he has also vaulted himself to represent the party itself. He has to hold himself to higher standards if he's gonna do that. Which, in my opinion, he didn't do.

He is giving the vast middle America reason to dislike Republicans. He has so far, and can continue to drum up support--for Democrats. Thats not because he's a Republican, nor because he's 'effective'...its because there is blood in the water and the sharks are out and he started all that of his free will. He messed up and its no one else's fault but his own.

The difference between group one and group two though isn't politics or political leanings. Its that group one its hunting for a partisan fight to defend their holy grail, which in this case isn't an ideal, its a person.

Group two though believes the party is bigger than any one politician and we need to keep it as such.

It just depends on how you represent conservatism.

With that being said, DeLay, no matter how you look at it is nearing the end of his carreer. Maybe he'll end up being the Strom Thurmond of the House, but I doubt it. I believe the party as a whole needs to put that stuff to bed and move beyond it, primarily so we can move forward. Right now its a distraction.

I believe someone new needs to go in because they will give new life to things. Its time for a changing of the guard basically.

Call me a DeLay basher if you will...so be it.

If anything that I am truly complaining about DeLay about is that he comes across as a jerk that thinks he's too big to be touched. His head is too big and I don't like it. If there is one thing I am 'bashing' him about, thats it. The rest of the stuff mentioned above isn't bashing Tom DeLay.

26 posted on 02/23/2006 7:50:52 PM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
If anything that I am truly complaining about DeLay about is that he comes across as a jerk that thinks he's too big to be touched. His head is too big and I don't like it. If there is one thing I am 'bashing' him about, thats it. The rest of the stuff mentioned above isn't bashing Tom DeLay.

I concur. The politics of DeLay and Campbell are similar. I can't make a distinction based on politics. Therefore I go to character. Campbell wins.

27 posted on 02/23/2006 8:01:37 PM PST by SolidSupplySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide

God bless one of the few GOPers in this nation with true will to rule.


28 posted on 02/23/2006 8:04:13 PM PST by wardaddy (I want to be king ........tribute, neat robes ...and best of all Prima Noctra.......I'm down wid it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu
National elections are not won on the fringes, they are won in the trenches...inch by inch.

As much as we would all like to see a major shift to the right, all RIGHT NOW, its not going to happen. Bit by bit, inch by inch is the way to conquer. We have to win the hearts and minds.

The condescending stuff some republicans throw out doesn't do much of anything but piss people off. DeLay is using an old tactic, but now we have a chance to galvanize a Republican majority we have to do things differently.

29 posted on 02/23/2006 8:07:00 PM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide
I am even talking about more than that...see post #29

Right now Republicans in order to shift right the country we need to identify what needs to be done. We won't go anywhere by sticking doggedly to the fringes.

We need people in office and not just that one seat who can diplomatically aim for the hearts and minds of the vast middle and explain to them WHY things ought to be the way we say.

Of all the things Tom DeLay is, one thing he isn't is a diplomat.

30 posted on 02/23/2006 8:26:37 PM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

He was reconnoitering Union positions with his staff at dusk when he came upon Confrederate pickets. They mistook them for Union cavalry.


31 posted on 02/23/2006 8:30:22 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide

Delay will win, and he will win easily.


32 posted on 02/23/2006 8:31:02 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Delay will win, and he will win easily.

Unfortunately, DeLay is trailing Lampson in the polls. Also, DeLay's vote total was 7-10% less than President Bush in 2004. In a district where Bush easily topped 60%, DeLay only got 55%.

Lastly, we have a former GOP Congressman (Steve Stockman) who is planning an independent campaign. Stockman would likely draw votes from disaffected Republicans away from DeLay in the general election. In November, I predict that the winner in CD-22 will have less than 50% of the vote. Noone can claim to have won such a race "easily".

I want to make Stockman a non-factor by having a Republican (Tom Campbell) that everyone in the party can support.

33 posted on 02/23/2006 8:41:28 PM PST by SolidSupplySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
Perhaps if you spent a like amount of time and effort worrying about Hawaii's politics [the epitome of a socialist state] you would wouldn't piss-off so many Texan's as you've already done.

There's nothing 'national' about the race DeLay is running in his district. It's the demonRATs that are trying to make DeLay's contest a national event.

BTW - Coleman will lose, a large margin or not - he will still lose - as he should. But the likes of you and the demonRATs will make something negative out of his win - both in the primary and in November.

34 posted on 02/23/2006 9:38:22 PM PST by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii; SolidSupplySide

HEY BOZO's...any more wild a$$ed predictions, or revelations you two losers want to make!?!


35 posted on 03/08/2006 6:00:21 AM PST by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: harpu

The guy I liked lost and you, and the guy are still assholes. What's changed?


36 posted on 03/08/2006 3:38:26 PM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
"The guy I liked lost..." NO, not just lost, HE GOT HIS POLITICAL A$$ HANDED TO HIM - BIG TIME!
37 posted on 03/08/2006 3:54:04 PM PST by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: harpu
How about this prediction:

Posted by maui_hawaii to Dubya
On News/Activism 02/02/2006 7:59:23 PM PST · 3 of 8

Question to those in the know:
If after the March 7 primary, which most likely DeLay will win...

What happens if something 'big' happens, ie he's forced out of the race for whatever reason?

Does the Dem candidate automatically win?

This is a procedural/election question not a political one.

In that event, could DeLay be replaced by the GOP post primary?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies

38 posted on 03/08/2006 3:59:23 PM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
BTW, thanks for taking time out from your convalescing time over at the DU to share your ignorance with those of us who understand and appreciate the VALUE of Tom DeLay over that meathead you and the demonRATs were trying to shove down our throats.
39 posted on 03/08/2006 4:01:55 PM PST by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: harpu
I still think Tom Campbell would have been a better candidate.

IN fact, I am not even pitting Tom Campbell as man against man on this one. I say when its shown that Tom DeLay won't screw things up for everyone... then my questions will be answered.

40 posted on 03/08/2006 4:02:17 PM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson