To: mnehrling
But, does congress have the authority to override the deal in the first place? Technically, I don't know if Bush even needs to veto it if it is bad law- it may be a symbolic gesture to slap their hands. This may be more of a Supreme Court issue to validate the legality of the original process and/or any changes congress may pass. DING DING DING!!! You win the cookie!!! THis whole thing is about breaking down the Separation of powers and giving Congress more power and regulation control.
And the Dems, MSM etc have played on the xenophobes and worryworts to the hilt on this issue.
38 posted on
02/23/2006 7:13:08 AM PST by
commish
(Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
To: commish
And the Dems, MSM etc have played on the xenophobes and worryworts to the hilt on this issue.
This has been an almost flawless strategy by the left to split our side.. just read the blogs and all the boards here.. Don't doubt for a moment that having Jimmy Carter agree with Bush was part of the strategy to make many on the right puke at the deal.
49 posted on
02/23/2006 7:18:14 AM PST by
mnehring
(Perry 06- It's better than a hippie in a cowboy hat or a commie with blue hair.)
To: commish
And the Dems, MSM etc have played on the xenophobes and worryworts to the hilt on this issue.Please include me on the xenophobe ping list.
Heck, 80% of Nevada is Federalized. Why not the ports of this country if only for Homeland Security?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson