Posted on 02/23/2006 6:58:42 AM PST by Howlin
"folks specializing in Islamic finance"
This deal has got to be stopped! Get busy people and write, telephone, etc. your Rep's.
That should have been Associated Terminals, which operates on the Mississippi and at the Port of South Louisiana (principally).
Affiliated -- Associated -- they kind of run together in the brain, and the fingers.
Assuming that "Associated Terminals" is 100% American owned, that along with SSA Marine, makes TWO - you really think they can raise $7 billion and run P&O - why didn't they bid then?
I disagree this deal has to be stopped - I can easily make the argument this IMPROVES national security and stopping it will spark a global trade war - maybe that's what some FReepers want, but not me.
So, make the argument --
Exactly - no U.S. owned company bid for what was available - if you are aware of any company that could run just the U.S. terminal operations, then let me know.
Over 825 posts on this very thread have included plenty of cites to why specific security improvements - did you also see the thread on the COO of DWP discussing this, not to mention how this deal was getting Dubai to cooperate even more in the WoT - I will have to see if I can find my hypothetical above re: global trade war sparked by other countries kicking out U.S. companies in retaliation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.