Skip to comments.
'Today' Expert Cressey Backs Bush Port Plan: "Everyone's Hyperventilating"
Today Show/NewsBusters ^
| Mark Finkelstein
Posted on 02/23/2006 5:01:31 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
To: Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; netmilsmom; Diogenesis; YaYa123; MEG33; ...
Today show/NewsBusters ping.
2
posted on
02/23/2006 5:02:07 AM PST
by
governsleastgovernsbest
(Watching the Today Show Since 2002 So You Don't Have To.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I admittedly don't know much about Mr. Cressey, but I'm in full agreement with him on the hyperventilating.
3
posted on
02/23/2006 5:04:11 AM PST
by
Coop
(FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
We've had foreign ownership of the ports . . . for a number of years nowBritain is NOT the UAE.
4
posted on
02/23/2006 5:06:26 AM PST
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Would be nice to have balance on the security aspects. But it makes no sense to have an on-air feud over the politics of the decision, there's been more than enough grandstanding and blather already.
5
posted on
02/23/2006 5:07:17 AM PST
by
palmer
(Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
To: palmer
I believe that when all the dust settles on this thing, there will be alot of egg on alot of faces both Republican and Democrat. Polical expediency generally comes back to bite the person(s)involved.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Bless your heart for this one!!! I was watching, and so shocked I forgot to take notes. I don't think I've ever seen Cressey so unequivical in his support of Bush. Hellsbells, I don't think I've ever heard him be supportive of Bush!!!!! (As an NBC analyst, I figured his job was to criticize the administration, cause that's what he's always done.
Lauer tried his hardest to evoke Bush criticism from Cressey, but it didn't happen.
7
posted on
02/23/2006 5:11:47 AM PST
by
YaYa123
To: Puppage
8
posted on
02/23/2006 5:13:52 AM PST
by
satchmodog9
(Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
It would shock me if Matt Lauer would pose the same adversarial questions to democrats instead of saying 'Amen'.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I have a feeling that with the Today show bringing him on is a signal to the Dems that this topic is another one that won't bring down Bush, or show that they are tougher on national security than Republicans.
I am disappointed with Republicans who jumped on the hysteria before the facts prove or disprove the legitimacy of the deal. I am open to both arguments, but at this point it doesn't look like there are any new security concerns at the ports that aren't already there.
10
posted on
02/23/2006 5:17:26 AM PST
by
soloNYer
To: Puppage
The UAE is not Syria or Iran.
LLS
11
posted on
02/23/2006 5:17:27 AM PST
by
LibLieSlayer
(Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
To: traderrob6
McCain will come out looking the best, since he wasn't involved in the outrage. I'm no McLame supporter but he got this one right.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Cressey: "Let's keep in mind Richard Green [the shoe bomber] was from Great Britain, we've had several attacks inside Great Britain by home-grown terrorists. Great Britain has a terrorist threat, a problem. Are we worried about that, because they were controlling US ports before this? This is another specious argument. It's like saying Tim McVeigh was an American, so Americans should not work at the ports. You can't extrapolate from an isolated event. The Bush administation apparently lives in a dream world when it comes to the Arabs. It's really disappointing.
13
posted on
02/23/2006 5:18:28 AM PST
by
veronica
("A person needs a sense of mission like the air he breathes...")
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Who is watching and who cares!??
14
posted on
02/23/2006 5:19:49 AM PST
by
IronManBike
(Lodestar in the LoneStar--multitask)
To: All
As most folks here know, Rush has refrained from rushing to judgment on the issue. I'm predicting Rush will mention Cressey's interview today.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Absolutely Bin Laden's family represents a large Muslim owned construction company...having successfully completed projects around the world..
These projects have not mysteriously fallen down or blown themselves up killing thousands...
Muslims wont be getting into the country any easier than they already are...nor will they be able to sneak WMD with any more difficulty than they already are able to..
Let them run the ports...whats the big deal...in fact let them cater all of Washington DC's meals from now on...
imo
16
posted on
02/23/2006 5:20:34 AM PST
by
joesnuffy
(A camel once bit our sister..but we knew just what to do...we gathered rocks and squashed her!)
To: IronManBike
Who is watching and who cares!??Over 5.4 million people daily. Today remains an important shaper of news and views for many Americans.
To: Puppage
That's right - since 9/11, no UAE citizens have been involved in terrorists attacks against the U.S.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Once again, rational thought by people who know better will always come out ahead. This entire issue was manufactured by the left to play on people's fears and mistrust of the "evil a-rabs" so they appear strong on national defense. They wanted to appeal to middle america so they decided to skillfully play the "fear card" like they so frequently accuse the republicans of doing.
This entire episode was a smokescreen blown out there by democrats until the next "scandal dujour" comes up. I'm not surprised by that, what has me pissed is the willingness of the republicans to be manipulated and go along with this manufactured issue without getting all the facts. We have now probably alienated a valuable ally in the GWOT and most importantly have placed our military bases in the UAE (the facilities that will most likely be used in any attack against Iran) in jeopardy.
Once again, the republicans prove why they don't deserve majorities because they don't know how to lead.
19
posted on
02/23/2006 5:21:32 AM PST
by
newnhdad
(All your government branches are belong to us!!)
To: Puppage
Neither are the ChiComms.
L
20
posted on
02/23/2006 5:21:52 AM PST
by
Lurker
(In God I trust. Everybody else shows me their hands.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson