To: apackof2
Ohhhh. I thought you meant it as an argument against it; a 10% chance of complications is not a compelling deterrent to surgical procedures generally. I see what you mean.
To: linda_22003
Ohhhh. I thought you meant it as an argument against it; a 10% chance of complications is not a compelling deterrent to surgical procedures generally. I see what you mean. If you tell a woman that if she has an abortion, she runs a 10% risk of becoming unable to have any children in the future I think you would see a sizable number of women decide that they don't want to take that kind of risk.
Information is power, except in the case of a woman seeking an abortion I suppose.
To: linda_22003
Well actually I do see it as a compelling reason as most women don't want to take ANY chance for NEVER having a child and its a FACT that this information is NOT being told to women who are thinking of an abortion
It could very well be the reason a woman decides not to have an abortion after all therefore saving a life
20 posted on
02/23/2006 7:26:59 AM PST by
apackof2
(You can stand me up at the gates of hell, I'll stand my ground and I won't back down)
To: linda_22003
I thought you meant it as an argument against it; a 10% chance of complications is not a compelling deterrent to surgical procedures generally I see the pro-abortion crowd has shown up.
Only one so far .... but just like rats and roaches, where there's one, there may be others!
21 posted on
02/23/2006 7:28:45 AM PST by
JohnnyZ
(Happy New Year! Breed like dogs!)
To: linda_22003
a 10% chance of complications is not a compelling deterrent to surgical procedures generally.shiver.... surgical procedure...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson