Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MikeinIraq

Question, Mr. "InIraq," when did "conservatives" decide to put a price tag on national security? Why "force" an American company to be interested when we could simply raise the bar for admission to bid by increasing the amount we're willing to pay for port operations in order to secure those ports by not hiring cut-rate-security-risks like DPWorld?

You question my conservatism, but the fact is you're saying that as long as the price is low enough, you're fine with Islamists running the ports. I wonder if we could get Al Qaeda to guard our nukes for fifty cents, and if that would be okay with you, too?


22 posted on 02/22/2006 4:52:17 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (Freedom isn't free--no, there's a hefty f'in fee--and if you don't throw in your buck-o-5, who will?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: LibertarianInExile
Question, Mr. "InIraq," when did "conservatives" decide to put a price tag on national security?

That's so ignorant of the situation I don't know if I should even give it a response.
24 posted on 02/22/2006 4:53:41 PM PST by MikefromOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: LibertarianInExile

Muslims will not be running things. Only writing the checks. Nothing is going to change. You should listen to Rush. Besides if the liberal moonbats are against this, then I'm for it.


72 posted on 02/22/2006 5:57:39 PM PST by beckysueb (Smoke 'em if you got ,em!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson