Skip to comments.
THE PORT DEAL - THIS COULD BE BUSH'S FIRST VETO? HE'S JOKING, RIGHT? (Boortz on Poortz)
Nealz Nuze ^
| 2/22/06
| Neal Boortz
Posted on 02/22/2006 4:24:38 PM PST by LibertarianInExile
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: LibertarianInExile
hey Neil...... Stupid has no cure but ignorance does. Educate yourself before shooting off your mouth and exposing your shallowness. World trade is above your paygrade. Silence would be thge best policy till the ignorance is remediated.
3
posted on
02/22/2006 4:29:33 PM PST
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. Slay Pinch)
To: LibertarianInExile
Good article. Interesting points about the manifests, counters the arguements that "oh, the UAE will not be in a position to subvert security at all".
4
posted on
02/22/2006 4:30:34 PM PST
by
ozoneliar
("The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants" -T.J.)
To: LibertarianInExile
I;m pretty certain that he won't need to use a veto on this.
I figure that in two or 3 more days, the right will have recovered from there VERY liberal-like knee jerk initially on this issue. They will have re-examined it, and they will come to realize that nothing's really changed, except the name on the check......
The outrage will be gone. Whatever resolution comes up will either barely make it through congress and there will be a veto, but more likely, any resolution will die in committee.
It's about timing now and how quickly it will come about.
To: bert
yes yes profit over everything /s
6
posted on
02/22/2006 4:31:55 PM PST
by
Charlespg
(Civilization and freedom are only worthy of those who defend or support defending It)
To: bert
And your credentials are???
7
posted on
02/22/2006 4:32:01 PM PST
by
bordergal
(1)
To: LibertarianInExile
Great Britain is not an Islamic Nation.
I would beg to differ here. The British Empire has been taken over by the muzzies long ago. They own most of the property and business throughout.
8
posted on
02/22/2006 4:32:57 PM PST
by
Mrs. Shawnlaw
(No NAIS! And the USDA can bugger off, too!)
To: bert
Nice rebuttal. You so effectively refute every point he raises. It's like a primer for how to dissect an argument logically! /sarc
Too bad you are such a typical supporter of the deal. Some of us would support the President here if he or his supporters could make a good case for the handover.
9
posted on
02/22/2006 4:34:56 PM PST
by
LibertarianInExile
(Freedom isn't free--no, there's a hefty f'in fee--and if you don't throw in your buck-o-5, who will?)
To: Mrs. Shawnlaw
Admittedly, I had a similar reaction, in light of another article recently posted--I think it was a Steyn piece, in fact--about the Muslim terrorists based in Britain were being seriously considered a threat for once.
However, Boortz is correct in that most British companies are not run by a Muslim state that supported the Taliban.
10
posted on
02/22/2006 4:37:37 PM PST
by
LibertarianInExile
(Freedom isn't free--no, there's a hefty f'in fee--and if you don't throw in your buck-o-5, who will?)
To: LibertarianInExile
To: LibertarianInExile
There just must be something here under the surface. Something unseen. Something undisclosed. The Bush White House just can't be this blind to the legitimate concerns of the people and of those in Congress who are concerned about this move.
Okay, I'll start.
1- Bush SUDDENLY decided that the US needed to 'wean itself off of oil' -- ahem, this from an OILMAN? My conjecture is that BUSH has been PAID OFF some how and some way. Follow the money.
2- Bush is acting 'dumb' to the clamor against the Nation of Muslim Caliphs as if it's a 'bigot' thing. FOLLOW THE MONEY.
3- Liberals will call Conservatives all kinds of names to try to shift the focus from ISLAM to anything else. However, SOME Liberals are looking at this with renewed vision. This issue may bring some Liberals and Conservatives together.
Follow the Money. What's the pay-off? Where is this going? I, for one, am afraid for my grandchildren.
Bush is acting like Andy Jackson did when the Cherokee won their lawsuit all the way to the Supreme Court, and he refused to abide by the decision.
Tell me where the money trail leads.
12
posted on
02/22/2006 4:38:06 PM PST
by
HighlyOpinionated
(In Memory of Crockett Nicolas, hit and run in the prime of his Cocker Spaniel life, 9/3/05.)
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: bert
btw, if you get a praise allah from me, you are most likely a terrorist sympathizer or a terrorist yourself supporting muslim terrorists around the world. this is the internet and we intend to ferret you all out.
To: MikeinIraq
I wish I could agree with you that the only thing changing is the name on the check. If that is true, why did no American company buy in? What made it so important for the UAE to buy in at a profit level evidently no American company found acceptable?
15
posted on
02/22/2006 4:45:05 PM PST
by
LibertarianInExile
(Freedom isn't free--no, there's a hefty f'in fee--and if you don't throw in your buck-o-5, who will?)
To: newgeezer; Admin Moderator
I did search. I did not find it. If the thread is deleted, that's fine.
16
posted on
02/22/2006 4:46:53 PM PST
by
LibertarianInExile
(Freedom isn't free--no, there's a hefty f'in fee--and if you don't throw in your buck-o-5, who will?)
To: LibertarianInExile
because there wasn't one INTERESTED?
The government should FORCE a company into a deal?
Since when is THAT a conservative ideal?
Look around, there was no American company interested in the deal.
To: MikeinIraq
Hi Mike!
Brit played an interview clip of the U.S. Chief Operations Officer for DWP. He is a 60 something AMERICAN gentleman. He is not an Arab, and has been with the company many years.
The more we find out about this thing, the more we find that bull$hit and disinformation is exposed.
LLS
18
posted on
02/22/2006 4:47:55 PM PST
by
LibLieSlayer
(Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
To: LibertarianInExile
19
posted on
02/22/2006 4:48:54 PM PST
by
Past Your Eyes
(You new the job was dangerous when you took it.)
To: LibLieSlayer
I guess so.
I didn't watch Brit tonight :)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson