Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Darkwolf377
I noticed these quotes.

"Rejecting the deal, he said, could have consequences."

"You have to take into account the broader foreign policy implications," he said. "We should be working to broaden our partnership in the broader war on terrorism."

We may need them in dealing with iran. I won't carry hillary or shumers dirty water especially if it hurts our troops or the war effort and helps iran.

The Presidents take on this is more credible than theirs, as he actually has a demonstrable record of caring about our troops. The left has been about helping the enemy.

30 posted on 02/22/2006 4:37:31 PM PST by monkeywrench (Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: monkeywrench
Thank you. I don't know about you but all day today on FR I've seen a lot more thoughtfulness about this issue than I did yesterday, and yet on the radio I've been hearing hysteria.

Those who think we are going to get anywhere in the Middle East while the left are continually circulating Abu Grhabe pictures and "We've lost" rhetoric need a head check. We must engage where we can and show the reason--SHOW them, not tell them--that it's to their benefit to see us as potential trading partners. Sorry, but they're not going to change because we pray for it to happen. We must act. The way we act is not to wait for some Christian Republican to rise to power there; we deal with what's there, and make them see that life will be better for them if they play nice.

37 posted on 02/22/2006 4:40:57 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (Dubai-u's fault--The Port Non-Issue is Hillary's Sistah Soulja moment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson