Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJackson
If Rumsfeld is in fact on the approving committee, the process was deeply flawed.

DoD is on the committee. Doesn't mean the representative (whomever it may have been) kept Rummy properly informed.

29 posted on 02/22/2006 8:44:56 AM PST by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Coop
DoD is on the committee. Doesn't mean the representative (whomever it may have been) kept Rummy properly informed.

The White House should know that. If, in the midst of a heated issue, the White House states every one of the Cabinet secretaries expressed that they were comfortable with this transaction being approved they should have known that statement was factual. In my view the process was flawed. Perhaps that's a function of legislation formulating the committee which is Congress' domain, perhaps a flaw in it's operation which belongs to the administration. While there may be none, there's clearly the potential for a security risk in this transaction, citizens of the UAE have been active in terror, al Qaida operates there, this should have come to the attention of Defence and the White House. I'll leave the political handling of the issue to speak for itself. At this point GWB should agree to a review and put the issue to bed. To threaten a veto over an issue he admittadly knew little about is ludicrous.

58 posted on 02/22/2006 8:54:01 AM PST by SJackson (There is but one language which can be held to these people, and this is terror, William Eaton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson