Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJackson
It doesn't for me.

Or me.

Especially since the Wash Times is reporting the deal was contingent on not having the more-rigorous 45-day review done:

http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20060221-091158-8114r.htm

There is a chance the deal would dissolve with the tougher 45-day review -- this has happened to previous reviews by the foreign investment committee -- and in this case it is clearly warranted. Last week, it emerged that both Dubai Ports World and Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co., the seller, specified that an agreement by the U.S. government not to make a formal investigation as a condition for the deal. This is exceedingly odd; this is enough to persuade Congress to push the review. "

110 posted on 02/22/2006 9:10:37 AM PST by dirtboy (I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy

Thanks for posting this because it makes the story even more intriguing. This is a questionable dealbreaker and I'd like to have some answers. No doubt it has something to do with international "security"?


115 posted on 02/22/2006 9:14:08 AM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson