[Deadshot Drifter]

You really, really, really gotta' 'splain your statement.

Judge Jones nor the woring of his ruling just doesn't strike me as the type of guy who gets off on power or thinks of himself as a government ordained pope. If Creationism isn't a religious belief, what is it?
and ID..ask 10 different people what it is or what the definition of it is and you'll likely get at least 5 different definitions, but the intent of the board in promoting it with Of Pandas and People, became crystal clear during the trial.

Ehh maybe your comments aren't sour grapes, but microgood's sure are.

[microgood]

Judge Jones nor the woring of his ruling just doesn't strike me as the type of guy who gets off on power or thinks of himself as a government ordained pope.

Then why did he order the plaintiffs to change their religious beliefs and declared to the world evolution is not in conflict with religion? And why did he award lawyers fee to the ACLU in a very heavy handed decision. This judge has an agenda from here to Pluto.

Ehh maybe your comments aren't sour grapes, but microgood's sure are.

Sour grapes in defense of liberty is not a vice.

[muawiyah]

Whatever "creationism" might be, if it has a religious element that's really not the business of any government agency in this country.

The judge will need to learn to hold his tongue in the future. Frankly, I don't care what he believes to be religious or non-religious. What I do care about is what he tells me, from the bench, what is religious ~ when he does that, he is violating the Constitution.