Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mewzilla
I believe it was three companies total. [Check that number.] And the DP Ports company was considered the best. I do not argue with that decision, that they were the best qualified of those that competed. But, I think we need to tread carefully, since...

'the administration is defending the port transfer... even though Dubai was an important base for the Sept. 11 plot,

Now read that last sentence again and tell me why this deal does not demand close and open scrutiny!

253 posted on 02/22/2006 7:16:55 AM PST by FOXFANVOX (Tony Snow fan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]


To: FOXFANVOX
Oh, I agree with the open scrutiny! :)

But if there's a good reason for doing this on the QT, I can only think of one biggie: and that's that we know something about the other two companies and we don't want that knowledge to become common knowledge. Just a guess :)

318 posted on 02/22/2006 7:47:38 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson