Skip to comments.
White House: Tone Deaf Or Brain Dead (Joseph Farah Slams Administration On Portsgate)
Worldnetdaily.com ^
| 02/22/06
| Joseph Farah
Posted on 02/22/2006 12:43:46 AM PST by goldstategop
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: Dane
due to his personal contacts he has an unrealistic idea of the Arabs. Read the family history, things have changed.
21
posted on
02/22/2006 1:22:37 AM PST
by
Sarah
To: Sarah
due to his personal contacts he has an unrealistic idea of the Arabs. Read the family history, things have changed Like I said before I will trust a President who has killed more islamic terrorists than any other president, rather than those who think they kill islamic terrorists from the comfort of banging keystrokes from a keyboard.
22
posted on
02/22/2006 1:27:20 AM PST
by
Dane
( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
To: goldstategop
Jimmy Carter is for it and Farah's against it.
Wow! Now this is a dilema!!
A senile, self righteous peanut farmer vs a loonball....which way do I turn for answers?
23
posted on
02/22/2006 1:33:49 AM PST
by
zarf
(It's time for a college football playoff system.)
To: Dane
It's the appearance of the whole thing that reeks of bad judgement. I think this is Bush's sense of loyalty betraying him again, the way it did when he appointed Brown to run FEMA.
24
posted on
02/22/2006 1:38:18 AM PST
by
WestVirginiaRebel
(Islamofascists don't need cartoons. They're already caricatures.)
To: WestVirginiaRebel
It's the appearance of the whole thing that reeks of bad judgement. So a President, according to you is supposed to base all his decisons on "style" and not on substance.
25
posted on
02/22/2006 1:45:59 AM PST
by
Dane
( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
To: Dane
No; a President is supposed to make his decisions based on whether or not he should trust a Government-owned company from a part of the world that hates our guts.
26
posted on
02/22/2006 1:55:33 AM PST
by
WestVirginiaRebel
(Islamofascists don't need cartoons. They're already caricatures.)
To: Echo Talon
No offense intended, but those departments don't exactly have a good record for protecting our borders.
27
posted on
02/22/2006 2:30:29 AM PST
by
Racer1
Comment #28 Removed by Moderator
To: Dane
In a stroke the President has evacuated the high ground on national security - the only issue on which he enjoys the confidence of the majority of the people.
He has allowed the Left to get to his right on this just as he has allowed Hillary to get to his right on border security.
The Rats are posturing to get to his right on spending.
Add this public relations disaster to Katrina and watch the returns in November. Perception in politics IS reality.
29
posted on
02/22/2006 3:32:32 AM PST
by
nathanbedford
(hon y sois qui mal y pense)
To: zarf
Jimmy Carter is for it and Farah's against it. Wow! Now this is a dilema!!
It sure is. There's got to be a way they can both be wrong.
30
posted on
02/22/2006 3:35:33 AM PST
by
nina0113
To: nina0113
Bush is not politically tone-deaf but in this case I think he was blinded by the "religion of peace" crapola. If terrorists are an extreme minority of misguided moslems, there is absolutely nothing wrong with allowing a responsible arab company access to our ports!
However, the rest of us think that these people are the soldiers of a mass movement in stealth. ERgo........a political disaster.
I confess I thought this "rop" crapola was for public consumption but apparently w really believes it (kind of like everybody coming over the border in Texas is just looking for a job)
31
posted on
02/22/2006 4:58:37 AM PST
by
cb
To: goldstategop
I return once again to one of my arguments, which is "would FDR have contracted with a German firm run by Albert Speer to oversee port operations on our Atlantic coast? I mean, after all the Coast Guard and the War Department would still have been "in charge" of security, and we would not have wanted to offend the Germans, now would we?
I submit that FDR would have been facing a hostile Congress and perhaps even impeachment.
32
posted on
02/22/2006 5:00:57 AM PST
by
mkjessup
(The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
To: All; goldstategop
Methinks everyone, every one, is missing what is happening here.
This IS a military move by George. His firm attitude, digging in his heels, is all what he has done in the past.
Does anyone remember the AIDS aid to Africa "debacle" in his first term, that had his own party wanting to tar and feather him?
Most folks never knew what that was all about. Soldier of Fortune magazine was the only outlet to put it in perspective.
Because of all that money George sent to Africa, for the Aids fight, (of course) our special forces were able to conduct "training" in areas of that continent that we never, ever had access to, before that point in time. What a boon for the war on terror.
George NEVER let on. Only Robert Brown and his folks dug up the story.
I wonder why the Brits, who have had the concessions for so long, decided to sell now. I wonder why Dubai was selected.
I think there is way more to this deal than we will know right now.
The only thing I have to believe is this:
Klintoon made deals with foreigners to benefit himself.
George makes deals with foreigners to benefit America.
I'll wager money that there is a major quid pro quo going on here, and I hope Colonel Brown's boys can dig up the truth.
33
posted on
02/22/2006 5:50:50 AM PST
by
Al Gator
(Remember to pillage BEFORE you burn!)
To: Dane
Joey Farah just killed three terrorist by typing DIE, DIE, DIE terrorists. Please do not underestimate the extreme power of Joey Farah :)
34
posted on
02/22/2006 7:12:28 AM PST
by
jveritas
(Hate can never win elections.)
To: Echo Talon
People need to settle down. Just chew your cud contentedly as you're driven to the slaughterhouse.
35
posted on
02/22/2006 12:15:36 PM PST
by
CobaltBlue
(Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson