[Lunatic Fringe]

Once again...

Evolution is scientific fact. It is a "theory," but most scientific theories are indeed undeniably true.

Evolution does not kill God.

[gobucks]

"Evolution does not kill God."

The keys of your keyboard must of had very confident clicking sounds as you typed all that....

[cripplecreek]

I wince every time I hear that someone can quote the Bible.

[bvw]

Facts are facts, scientific or not. It is a fact that IDEAS evolve, and that as those IDEAS evolve the DESIGNS that instantiate those ideas also evolve.

And perhaps you can explain what "undeniable truth" means. Most of us think truth is truth. Are you suggesting there is some bipolar version of truth, with one pole being deniable truth and the other undeniable truth? What, praytell, do you mean?

[doc30]

Name just one scientific theory proven true. Bet you a dollar you can't.

[sarasmom]

"Evolution is scientific fact. It is a "theory," "
LOL!
The scientific "theory of evolution" has not been proven in the same way that the "theory of mathematics" has been proven.
Don't attempt to misuse and abuse the lowly "language arts" as a craven and contrived method to bolster your unproven quasi-scientific belief system!
Just start the science class segment stating: we have no real proof, but this is our best scientific WAG as to how sentient life began on this planet...

[driveserve]

"Evolution is scientific fact. It is a "theory," but most scientific theories are indeed undeniably true. "

Yes, the Ptolemaic theory of the solar system/universe comes to mind. The scientific theory of removing bad humors with leeches is often maligned. No leeches? A simple bleeding should suffice. And who can forget that falling off the edge of the Earth thing? That theory is indeed fact, insofar as you have just tumbled off, dweeb.

Theory: An assumption based on limited information or knowledge; a conjecture.

Where do you see "fact" in there?

[JavaTheHutt]

Evolution is scientific fact. It is a "theory," but most scientific theories are indeed undeniably true.

Once again...

Scientific facts are considered laws, not theories. For example, we have the Law of gravity, a fact of life. In comparison, we have the Theory of evolution, not a fact of life, but something marginally more substantive than a hypothesis.

[nmh]

"Evolution does not kill God."

But of course not!

LOL!

What evolution does do is call God a liar since His account and ORDER of Creation has nothing in common with evolution.

[nmh]

"Evolution is scientific fact."

Really!

Were YOU there?

Can you repeat "evolution"?

Can you test it?

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm ... by definition of a scientific "FACT" evolution is at most a hypothesis. I wouldn't even label it a theory since it makes no sense.

[AlexW]

"Evolution is scientific fact. It is a "theory,"

Kingfish, I think we don got got a convolusion here!

Anyone under 50, nevermind :)

[rwfromkansas]

Science can't prove anything, only support it with evidence.

[Hermann the Cherusker]

Evolution is scientific fact.

Really? Could you cite the laboratory experiment where "evolution" was replicated, and a scientist was able to demonstrate the transmutation of species through natural selection? Or maybe the scientist who observed a man being born from a monkey or a bird from a dinosaur?

Because I had thought scientific facts must be observable and replicable.

[sasafras]

Evolution is scientific fact BUT creation via evolution is not. That is the argument being tested. There is NO evidence that life evolved from nothing. Evolution theory regarding this is no more credible than creation theory.