Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ccmay

I totally agree. Wasn't Hill's mysterious Master's thesis on Alinsky? Seems I read about it somewhere.


24 posted on 02/21/2006 10:22:10 PM PST by Bernard Marx (Fools and fanatics are always certain of themselves, but the wise are full of doubts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Bernard Marx
It was, supposedly, on Alinsky's Rules For Radicals, itself a derivation of Gramsci. I don't think a great deal of it, frankly - it's pop Marxism rather than the real deal. A young Hillary evidently felt otherwise.

The postmodern version of Marx is highly emotional largely because it is deliberately too obscure to admit of precise logical analysis. Emotion turns out to be as powerful a motivator in politics as it is elsewhere in the life of men and women, but this particular set of emotions does not represent humanity's finer moments - it consists of pure distilled envy and of hatred, specifically hatred for success and its dismissal as mere theft from the unsuccessful.

It is the latter that explains the rationalization behind redistribution. That is Marx's last malign gift to a society he hated because it didn't conform to his fantasies. Those fantasies outlived him because their bases of hatred and envy are basic to the human condition.

26 posted on 02/21/2006 11:15:26 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson