Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Soldiers Must Be Adaptive for Future, Army Chief Says
American Forces Press Service ^ | Feb 21, 2006 | Sgt. Sara Wood, USA

Posted on 02/21/2006 4:01:44 PM PST by SandRat

WASHINGTON, Feb. 21, 2006 – The nature of the threat facing the U.S. military has changed drastically, and soldiers need to grow and become more flexible to face that threat, the Army chief of staff said here Feb. 17. In an interview with the Pentagon Channel, Army Gen. Peter J. Schoomaker said the Army now faces an asymmetrical threat, so soldiers must be prepared to perform many different functions, ranging from high-end combat and untraditional warfare to stability operations and homeland defense.

"We now must cover a broader piece of the entire spectrum of operations, and because we have a force that is going to face challenges that will be dynamic and will move across the various challenges on the spectrum, we'll need people that are learning and adaptive," Schoomaker said.

This new breed of soldier, which Schoomaker dubbed the "pentathlete," will be skilled in his specific field but also be able to perform other functions, in case a need arises on the battlefield, he said.

"It's about having very athletic people in very athletic organizations -- people that can play multiple positions, that aren't defined very narrowly by a specific military occupational specialty," he said.

Being an all-volunteer force that retains most of its people, the Army has a vested interest in developing its soldiers to their highest capacity, Schoomaker said. As soldiers become more experienced at their craft, the force becomes more professional and expectations must be raised, he said.

"We can't act like we used to act and expect too little from the great talent we've got in our force," he said. "People will rise to the challenges that we place before them, and we expect that of our soldiers -- for them to be masters of their primary skills, to be very good at other skills, and to grow every day and adapt."

Soldiers are the centerpiece of the Army, and they need to realize that what they are involved in right now is very important and will have lasting effects, Schoomaker said. The Army is undergoing its largest transformation in 50 years, he said, and it must endure through the growing pains to become a force that is more prepared to fight the long war on terror.

"It's an exciting time to be in the Army, and it is a time of extraordinary transformation," he said


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: adaptive; army; future; must; soldiers

1 posted on 02/21/2006 4:01:45 PM PST by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SandRat
I think Gen. Schoomaker has been an excellent choice for Army Chief of Staff.
2 posted on 02/21/2006 4:04:59 PM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Or, as an Air Force Colonel once remarked to us crew dogs, "I have never seen a mission so screwed up by the staff that the crews couldn't rescue it."

Of course, that was before Vietnam.

There was another AF saying that applies: "'Flexibility' is SAC's answer for not getting it right in the first place." Kind of sounds like what the General's saying, if you're a veteran and a cynic.


3 posted on 02/21/2006 4:34:51 PM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

"soldiers need to grow and become more flexible"

Ouch!


4 posted on 02/21/2006 5:10:44 PM PST by MajorityOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Honestly, I think I'd rather the military forces stuck to the traditional "break things and hurt people", quick, fast and in a hurry. They should then be rotated out. Period.

I'd like to see the time come when someone shouts "U.S. is coming", and all that can be heard is the sound of sphincters slamming shut and sandals pounding the dirt going in the opposite direction. Now, that's the start to a good maneuver.

For the humanitarian end of things, well, there are plenty of liberals (whose patriotism can NOT be questioned), who could be airlifted in to put band-aids on boo-boos and hold hands after the fact. I mean, what do we pay the U.N. for? Advice?

And I hear Jimmah Cahtah is looking for something to do...

Bonus!


5 posted on 02/21/2006 6:08:00 PM PST by heldmyw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson