Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv
...and the people seized were not slaves, or escaped slaves. Just treated as if they were by the ANV.

I'm sure the Army had better things to do than spend the time verifying the freedom of each and every person they came across? What became of these freedmen that were shipped back behind Confederate lines?

The fact of the matter, though, is that there was no such policy, it was entirely up to the slaveowner, and while not unheard of, was rare.

How is my statement untrue? The promise was made as a part of the American Revolution, by both sides—Slaves who fought for (party x) would receive their freedom. I believe the same statements were made in the war of 1812.

Regards,
~dt~

173 posted on 02/21/2006 10:58:10 AM PST by detsaoT (Proudly not "dumb as a journalist.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: detsaoT

Depends -- which war *do* you want to talk about? Secession was about the preservation of slavery, and this SC professor claiming that something which came about because of Lee's putting it forward (quite late in the war, when all was all but lost) doesn't change that.


191 posted on 02/21/2006 11:57:42 AM PST by SunkenCiv (The love of learning, the sequestered nooks, And all the sweet serenity of books. (Longfellow))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson