Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PeaRidge

Good one, PR, but the question is nearly moot in that South Carolina seceded in January, 1861. But yes, Lincoln was a clever man and he knew well what would happen if he tried to resupply Fort Sumter. But the spark for war certainly would have occurred somehow; if not in Charleston, then somewhere else.

Thanks for your very cogent post!


139 posted on 02/21/2006 9:36:53 AM PST by RexBeach ("There is no substitute for victory." -Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: RexBeach
South Carolina did not secede in January of 1861. The state seceded in December of 1860. There was no law preventing that action, so nothing is moot, and nothing was contingent upon this action that caused any act of war.

"But the spark for war certainly would have occurred somehow; if not in Charleston, then somewhere else."

'Sparks' had been occurring since almost at the time of ratification of the Constitution. Massachusetts had threatened secession on several occasions. Remember the Nullification Crisis. Sectional hostility was manifested in Kansas/Missouri.

But sparks did not bring about war. Conscious decisions of men in power did. And you have not answered the question of what outcome did Lincoln seek by sending the US Navy to Charleston.
197 posted on 02/21/2006 12:58:57 PM PST by PeaRidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson