[.cnI redruM]

If watersheds know no boundaries, as you claim, than any legislation at all regulating their use, potentially devalues any piece of land I happen to own. Giving a government agency a blanket power like that is in no way in the interest of liberty. Unless a logical and sane border on what land is considered "wetlands" can be established, the government has no Constitutional right to regulate their use.

[hedgetrimmer]

potentially devalues any piece of land I happen to own.

If 'watersheds' become the thing government protects instead of your property and your property rights, the environmentalists have effectively usurped our constitutional government and replaced it with a form of collectivism that knows no boundaries.