Upon further review, you are correct. The correct logical conclusion of your statement was that no books should be banned for sexual content because Shakespeare employed sexual content. The logic is actually consistent, not faulty. That you now deny the logical neccessity of the conculsion is fallacy.
My argument: Schools should not ban a book because it contains sexual content.
I agree, to a point. Argument you assigned to me: Schools should not ban a book if it contains sexual content.
Again, that is the consistent logical conclusion of your statement.
But, we are belaboring this point to excess, so if the above is your opinion on the matter, I agree with you, to a certain extent.
BTW, it is OK to admit you made a mistake. No one will think less of you. Really.
Stop posting to me. You are an imbecile.