You buffoon. You seem to have "forgotten" that I've always said my example was merely about illustrating the mechanism of embedded cascading taxes to show there is a good bit of leeway for price decreases. I've specifically told you - several times, in fact, that I'll offer up no values to attack since it is the mechanism I'm illustrating and the numbers will be whatever they end up being - which neither you nor anyone else "knows" (though it makes you feel superior to pretend you do).
If you want "numbers" to attack, go take Nightie's example and correct it as I directed so that it is more likely to have a relation to reality. Then you can go argue with him about his numbers since that seems like all you wish to do.
But then you've know that all along, haven't you. Perhaps that why, after SIX year of asking, you've NEVER, EVER been able to even hazard a GUESS at how much those "embedded cascading business tax costs" might be. Not a clue; not wild a$$ guess; not a single authoritative source ...
... nothing but pigdog's magic glasses that let you see things that aren't actually there.
I guess without your delusions, you'd have nothing at all.