To: DJ MacWoW
They can't take over unless it's ok'd by the US. period. P&O can sell anything they like but we have to ok it. Those "in the know" say it's not a done deal. Most conservative pundits are saying it's not going anywhere and will be stopped. British shareholders have NO say in US security. Uh the point still stands DPWorld now legitmately owns P&O's assets and if they are not allowed to operate they can sell or strip the assets and infrastructure and have a perfect legal right to while putting many Americans out of work.
56 posted on
02/20/2006 4:17:10 PM PST by
Dane
( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
To: Dane
Uh the point still stands DPWorld now legitmately owns P&O's assets Ignoring post 47?
59 posted on
02/20/2006 4:19:43 PM PST by
DJ MacWoW
(If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
To: Dane
while putting many Americans out of work I don't think so. Running ports is something Americans still know how to do. Especially now that it's more or less computerized.
Besides, you forgot your argument that "the port operator doesn't really do anything but supervise the longshoremen."
68 posted on
02/20/2006 4:28:14 PM PST by
CobaltBlue
(Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
To: Dane
No they do not own squat yet.
71 posted on
02/20/2006 4:29:16 PM PST by
TXBSAFH
(Proud Dad of Twins, What Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger!!!!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson