Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightCanuck
John Kennedy does not fare well in review of history. Khruschev's son indicates that his father saw Kennedy as weak, indecisive and inept. In retrospect, the cold war started to get much hotter when Kennedy was in office and stayed that way until President Reagan's election.

We remember him for facing Khruschev down in the Cuban Missile Crisis. In fact, we gave up missiles in Turkey in trade for the missiles in Cuba. Kennedy totaly screwed the Cuban Brigade in the Bay of Pigs invasion by withdrawing air support that was promised. He did this after they were on the beach.

Kennedy's camelot would never survive if scrutinized at the same level that W experiences today (Although we know it would never happen). We saw him take nepotism to a level that would never be tolerated today, when he appointed his brother Bobbie as Attorney General.

We now know Kennedy had Addison's disease, a fatal disorder. We now know he was a drug addicted womanizer. These facts were completely concealed from the public by a incompetent or complicit press.

The main reason he got a "pass" on all this was Jackie. The public and press were starry eyed over her grace and charm then her martyred heroine status. His memory was untouchable as long as she was alive.

19 posted on 02/20/2006 11:30:44 AM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pfflier
These facts were completely concealed from the public by a incompetent or complicit press.

Ben Bradlee editor for the Washington Post (also from MA) practically lived at the WH during the Kennedy years. Camelot ... na, I don't think so ... it was simply portrayed that way by the fawning liberal media. Bradlee, in fact, was so enamored with Kennedy and that era, later wrote two books about him.

36 posted on 02/20/2006 12:08:20 PM PST by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: pfflier
John Kennedy does not fare well in review of history

Nor should he. From the standpoint of a "legacy," being assassinated was the best thing that could have happened to this loser. Khrushchev had him pegged and pinned to the wall. Had he lived he would have done something really stupid, even more stupid than crossing the Rubicon in VietNam with no more than a few thousand "advisors."

100 posted on 08/25/2006 8:30:54 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson