Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: linda_22003
So, you're saying you'd prefer women to "face the decision" by surgically aborting several weeks later, when the pregnancy is established and farther along. I don't see that as a better course, so we disagree on that.

Are you saying you really believe that if a Wal-Mart refuses to fill this script, the woman will be unable to obtain the drug? First, that's almost certainly not true as things are now. When Governor Blagojevich imposed this crap on pharmacists in illinois, there were cases where the women who were denid the drug by a particular pharmacist could literally walk down the block and get it at another store. Second, if pharmacists don't want to stock the drug, let the doctors give it instead of writing scripts.

Let's keep government out of these affairs.

158 posted on 02/20/2006 10:03:16 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (GOP Blend Coffee--"Coffee for Conservative Taste!" Go to www.gopetc.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Silverback

"Are you saying you really believe that if a Wal-Mart refuses to fill this script, the woman will be unable to obtain the drug?"

No. If you had followed the thread, you would have seen that was a general conversation about using the pill versus waiting longer to confirm and deal with a pregnancy. I was quite specific in another post that I did not think Wal-mart had to sell it.


164 posted on 02/21/2006 5:03:59 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson