Skip to comments.
Will Apple adopt Windows?
Guardian Unlimited ^
| February 17 2006
| Jack Schofield
Posted on 02/19/2006 2:38:01 PM PST by theFIRMbss
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
First I thought, No way!
But then I thought, well, Apple
needs people to talk.
Media wizards
then spin the talk Apple's way.
If Apple switches
that would get people
talking. Big time. That alone
might make Jobs do it!
To: theFIRMbss
2
posted on
02/19/2006 2:39:53 PM PST
by
Michael Goldsberry
(Lt. Bruce C. Fryar USN 01-02-70 Laos)
To: Michael Goldsberry
Well, MS has been "perfecting" Windows for many, many years. When the job is finally done, then maybe Apple will adopt. Maybe another 10-20 years.
3
posted on
02/19/2006 2:42:34 PM PST
by
Right Wing Assault
("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
To: theFIRMbss
Just think, If they did then Apple too would just lock up from time to time requiring a reboot; with no one questioning why. Allpe users would just accept it like we do.
It is a really good thing MS doesn't make cars, we would all be walking!
To: GrandEagle
like we do. Not me. My workstations run either Linux or Solaris.
At least OS-X is BSD with frosting.
5
posted on
02/19/2006 2:46:29 PM PST
by
Michael Goldsberry
(Lt. Bruce C. Fryar USN 01-02-70 Laos)
To: theFIRMbss
there will be riots at starbucks everywhere if that happens.
seperately, as a PC user, I admire the way the Mac does its desktop. As far as I'm concerned, the artsy fartsy interface is the best thing Apple has going for it.
6
posted on
02/19/2006 2:47:57 PM PST
by
the invisib1e hand
(i'd rather hunt with Cheney than drive with Kennedy)
To: theFIRMbss
It's an absurd notion.
The whole point of Apple--at least since their main competition started to be on the software level--was always the superior OS, the hardware arm was just a matter of having a 'vertical trust' to be able to withstand pressure from MS's horizonatal trust strategy. (Of course, it's easy to forget that in the early days, the days of the 'why 1984 won't be like 1984' Superbowl ad, Apple's main competition was at the hardware level--they were the 'David' fighting IBM's 'Goliath'.)
They made one switch already--making OS X a MacOS style GUI built on the Free BDS core (a dialect of UNIX)--but that was to make an even better OS.
Putting Windows on a Mac is like retrofitting a '67 Pontiac dashboard into a 2006 5-series Bimmer.
7
posted on
02/19/2006 2:48:16 PM PST
by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
To: Michael Goldsberry; All
>No way!
Will Microsoft Adopt Darwin?
By Chris Holland in Commentary
The idea that Microsoft would ditch its own OS for the key underlying technology that powers Apples flagship operating system came to me in a most auspicious e-mail from a dear friend of mine, Dr. Arnold E. Handy, a well-regarded professor of gynecology who wrote me convinced the process had already begun . . .
[The Apple Blog]
To: theFIRMbss
"The idea that Apple would ditch its own OS for Microsoft Windows came to me from Yakov Epstein, a professor of psychology at Rutgers University, who wrote to me convinced that the process had already begun. Burn the Blasphemer! Burn the Witch!
To: Michael Goldsberry
Not me. My workstations run either Linux or Solaris. Anyone remember "B"? An OS to challenge Linux or Windows or something like that?
And then there was Jobs's other computer/OS. Cube? Square?
10
posted on
02/19/2006 2:49:53 PM PST
by
freedumb2003
(American troops cannot be defeated. American Politicians can.)
To: Michael Goldsberry
My desktops at work run Linux, and at home I've got "BSD with frosting".
(Of course, as a category theorist, I've got a guild loyalty to Free BSD--the core was written by a categorist who went the CS route.)
11
posted on
02/19/2006 2:51:23 PM PST
by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
To: theFIRMbss
professor of gynecology who wrote me convinced the process had already begun
Satire?
To: The_Reader_David
>The whole point of Apple . . . was always the superior OS
Apple's a biz-ness,
that's the whole point of Apple.
The biz-ness world's strange . . .
To: the invisib1e hand
As far as I'm concerned, the artsy fartsy interface is the best thing Apple has going for it. You think the interface is smoove; you should set up the wireless network!
To: theFIRMbss
Why would Apple want to adopt an operating system of such poor quality? Windows is total nightmare for users and completely visually unappealing. A move to Windows would be a total nightmare for all computer users because ALL innovation comes from Apple.
I think its more likely that Apple will begin selling computers with both operating systems on them, luring consumers into a side by side comparison where anybody with half a brain would, within a few months, realize how much better Mac OS X is and delete Windows.
15
posted on
02/19/2006 2:53:00 PM PST
by
big'ol_freeper
(..it takes some pretty serious yodeling to..filibuster from a five star ski resort in the Swiss Alps)
To: The_Reader_David
To: freedumb2003
To: theFIRMbss
The wife was looking at consumer ratings of laptops. The old model Apples had very high ratings, while the new ones with Intel parts were rated no better than mid level wintel laptops.
18
posted on
02/19/2006 2:54:51 PM PST
by
OK
To: theFIRMbss
19
posted on
02/19/2006 2:55:17 PM PST
by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: OK
...while the new ones with Intel parts were rated no better than mid level wintel laptops.It's a little premature for that, since they've barely shipped.
20
posted on
02/19/2006 2:56:08 PM PST
by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson