Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VOA

I would agree that the PBS show was better than expected, but to say it was "fair" is a stretch.

The historical coverage is nice, but you can 100% tell it was planned and edited by people who simply don't like the guy.

Why was it that the only 2 Reagan kids they interview are the two who had "issues" with their father, not the two who really got along well with him? Well, correction, they *did* have a brief interview with Maureen, but only to get her take on Iran/Contra. The other numerous interviews are with Patti and Ron, and nothing with Michael.


10 posted on 02/19/2006 5:26:37 PM PST by krb (ad hominem arguments are for stupid people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: krb

You do make a good point...not having at least a segment with Michael Reagan
was a deficit.
Maybe my view could have been skewed because I saw it when I lived in Los Angeles...
and my expectations were so low.

I did notice that the DVD was on sale at The Reagan Presidential Library Bookstore
when I visited in Sept. 2004. But I don't know if that was because the Library
staff thought it was a good documentary...or they were just carrying on
Reagan's vision for capitalism.


11 posted on 02/19/2006 5:50:35 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: krb
I would agree that the PBS show was better than expected, but to say it was "fair" is a stretch.

I retched throughout the entire Eleanor Roosevelt story. They portrayed her as the second coming of Christ.

17 posted on 02/20/2006 8:10:17 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Proud to be a cotton-pickin' Republican on the GOP Plantation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson