Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blame GOP Malaise on Bush's Team
Human Events Online ^ | 02-19-06 | Novak, Robert D.S.

Posted on 02/18/2006 8:51:14 PM PST by Theodore R.

Blame GOP Malaise on Bush's Team by Robert Novak Posted Feb 19, 2006

When Dick Cheney finally broke his silence by answering questions from Fox's Brit Hume last Wednesday, four days after the hunting accident, many Republicans could hardly believe it. They were stunned that the vice president indicated he had no regrets about the way the incident was handled. Every Republican I contacted had regrets in abundance.

Bush-bashers delighted in exaggerating Cheney's post-accident conduct as a metaphor for everything wrong with George W. Bush's presidency in its sixth year. Nevertheless, there are supporters of the president (and the vice president, as well) who believe the handling of the accident does reflect structural problems in the Bush White House. Those defects were present from the start of this presidency and remain, in the absence of a basic reconstruction after Bush's re-election.

Republican malaise in Washington derives less from anemic poll ratings than from overriding concern about how the Bush team functions. This anxiety is enhanced because Republican criticism of the White House is seen as evidence of disloyalty and consequently discouraged.

A vivid illustration is provided by Vin Weber, a former congressman who has been a major player in Republican politics for the past quarter of a century. While he now is a Washington lobbyist, he has remained deeply engaged in Republican politics (particularly back in his home state of Minnesota). Following the 2004 election, Weber was reported possibly to be coming to the White House as part of a staff reconstruction. In fact, Weber was willing to accept the economic sacrifice for him and his family by returning to public service.

But no call came from the White House because the president decided to stand pat in his staffing for a second term. Because Weber always has been a team player rather than an open-mouthed critic of his own administration, his comments on page one of last Wednesday's Washington Post attracted special attention. Weber specifically criticized Cheney, contending that the disclosure of the accident "should have been handled differently." In character, the White House let out the word that such mild criticism put this faithful Republican out of line.

Actually, as Weber surely would admit, the problems exposed by the Texas shooting were no aberration. But instead, they are systemic. Andrew Card, as Bush's only presidential chief of staff, has had an extraordinarily long tenure in that post of over five years, but has not dominated the presidential office in the manner of Sherman Adams and James Baker. Card always seemed less formidable than Bush political adviser Karl Rove, who with his additional title of deputy chief of staff mixes politics and policy.

If that is not complicated enough, Cheney is unique in the way he fills his constitutional office. Previous vice presidents either have been ignored or delegated specific duties, but Cheney is alone in emerging as an independent power center. A former White House chief of staff (in the Ford administration), Cheney is at least the equal of Card and Rove. Under this system, Cheney was able to keep quiet for 14 hours his accidental shooting of a fellow hunter.

The result was a week full of embarrassment and confusion, but the broader message is a dysfunctional White House that helps bring about a second term with an unclear domestic agenda and sagging party morale. Reports surfaced periodically during 2005 that new faces would appear in the interest of a more orderly, more effective administration.

Well-placed Republican sources reported that highly regarded Rob Portman, who resigned his congressional seat from Ohio to become U.S. trade representative, would come to the White House as chief of staff with expanded powers. As 2006 began, it was speculated that after the budget was presented former Sen. Phil Gramm would walk away from his lucrative commercial pursuits to become secretary of the treasury and a major positive force in the administration. However, talk of Portman and Gramm arriving appears to be wishful thinking.

The problem can be seen by the White House last week being more aggravated by Vin Weber's mild criticism than exposure of a dysfunctional staff system. The real cause for malaise is fear that the president will decide it is too late for a second-term reconstruction.

Mr. Novak is a syndicated columnist and editor of the Evans-Novak Political Report.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: andrewcard; brithume; cheney; gop; gwb; jamesbaker; karlrove; malaise; novak; philgramm; robportman; shermanadams; vinweber
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Has Robert D.S. Novak borrowed the word "malaise" from the press's reporting of GA Jimmy, or in the words of GA Jimmy, is this GOP malaise, like "the energy crisis . . . real"?
1 posted on 02/18/2006 8:51:17 PM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

A Democrat blaming Bush? Say it isn't so!

(Yes, Novak is a Democrat.)


2 posted on 02/18/2006 8:52:33 PM PST by Terpfen (72-25: The Democrats mounted a failibuster!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Has Novak just started doing the D.S? Weird, I've always just seen his Robert Novak name.


3 posted on 02/18/2006 8:54:03 PM PST by Marius3188
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

The column on HEO is attributed just to Robert Novak. I don't know where the poster got D.S. from.


4 posted on 02/18/2006 8:57:47 PM PST by Terpfen (72-25: The Democrats mounted a failibuster!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Sounds more like the sour grapes of a White House staffer wannabe who didn't get a job offer.

What a load of....

5 posted on 02/18/2006 8:57:53 PM PST by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Novak's dislike for Bush/Cheney has shown for YEARS...so, I would expect nothing different from him...than a piece filled with innuendo of problems...

He fills the column with speculation...and then bashes Bush for NOT doing what was speculated...perhaps the speculators forget one thing...

Bush makes up his own mind...he doesn't govern my polls, or pundit's suggestions.


6 posted on 02/18/2006 8:58:05 PM PST by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
" Following the 2004 election, Weber was reported possibly to be coming to the White House as part of a staff reconstruction. In fact, Weber was willing to accept the economic sacrifice for him and his family by returning to public service.

But no call came from the White House because the president decided to stand pat in his staffing for a second term.

Gee, I understand that Peggy Noonan was similarly waiting by her phone, for a WH position and none came.

And both had the same take on this week's events. How amazing, Novak.

I won't watch any FOX show, with this new "FOX correspondent" on it.

7 posted on 02/18/2006 8:58:42 PM PST by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen

Novak has two middle names: David Sanders.


8 posted on 02/18/2006 8:59:16 PM PST by Theodore R. (Cowardice is forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
I'm open to intelligent criticism, but note I said intelligent. This is just silly rehashing and ranting about an incident that, no matter how the MSM scream about it, and KEEP screaming about it, has NO IMPACT on the American people. NONE.

Meanwhile the MSM continue to avoid taking a hard stand on "offending Islam" by exercising freedom of the press.

9 posted on 02/18/2006 9:00:05 PM PST by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen
I don't know where the poster got D.S. from.

Dumb Sh!t?

10 posted on 02/18/2006 9:03:26 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter (It is easy to call for a pi$$ing contest when you aren't going to be in the line of fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DTogo
Sounds more like the sour grapes of a White House staffer wannabe who didn't get a job offer.

Lots of "loyal Bush supporters" mouthing off to the press last week; they're all trying to situate themselves for 2006, if you ask me.

11 posted on 02/18/2006 9:04:48 PM PST by Howlin ("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter

And Bill Kristol.


12 posted on 02/18/2006 9:05:10 PM PST by Howlin ("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

Works for me. :-)


13 posted on 02/18/2006 9:05:30 PM PST by Howlin ("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
LOL, Bob Novak, drama queen.
14 posted on 02/18/2006 9:07:36 PM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I was just thinking how much Novak sounds like Kristol in this column.

1. Presume to speak for the Republican party, and pour on the 'malaise'.

2. Name-drop and sound like you've got a lot of inside info.

3. Continue to bring up the old news, so that the bad story never dies.

15 posted on 02/18/2006 9:10:46 PM PST by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

You'd think Bush lost the House, the Senate, and all of his nominees to the SCOTUS failed....


16 posted on 02/18/2006 9:21:45 PM PST by D-Chivas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

But why add the initials when Novak himself doesn't?


17 posted on 02/18/2006 9:29:43 PM PST by Terpfen (72-25: The Democrats mounted a failibuster!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Why did you put DS after Novak's name? In the original article the writer's name is Robert Novak. What does DS stand for?
18 posted on 02/18/2006 9:38:13 PM PST by upchuck (Wikipedia.com - the most unbelievable web site in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

"many Republicans could hardly believe it. They were stunned that the vice president indicated he had no regrets about the way the incident was handled."

I guess I'm just a stupid Southerner. I relished Cheney's snubbing of the elite MSM.

When they went into conniptions over Cheney's going to Fox, I thought it was great.


19 posted on 02/18/2006 10:06:22 PM PST by I still care ("For it is the doom of men that they forget". - Merlin, from Excalibur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Can anyone tell me why we are seeing all these opinions stating that GOP/Conservatives are in disarray? They seem to be coming at a steady stream nowadays. I know we are critical of many in Congress and the President has been unable to be all things to all people - but are they thinking if they keep telling us this that we will suddenly vote for the SheBeast The New Centrist (NOT) or what.........
20 posted on 02/18/2006 10:09:47 PM PST by daybreakcoming (May God bless those who enter the valley of the shadow of death so that we may see the light of day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson