To: ncountylee
With the exception of a couple FReepers who believe the President is infallible, everyone seems to be against this. It's sheer idiocy to give a Muslim country the authority to manage U.S. Ports.
3 posted on
02/18/2006 7:00:13 PM PST by
BW2221
To: BW2221
5 posted on
02/18/2006 7:02:46 PM PST by
rose
To: BW2221
True and this is a direct correlation of ownership. The Panama Canal is indirectly owned by the Red Chineese Army (if reported intel is correct).
9 posted on
02/18/2006 7:04:31 PM PST by
K-oneTexas
(I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
To: BW2221
This issue hinges on the question of whether we are at war with terrorists or Islam.
To: BW2221
With the exception of a couple FReepers who believe the President is infallible, everyone seems to be against this. It's sheer idiocy to give a Muslim country the authority to manage U.S. Ports. I've been thinking about this, and it would seem the we ought to be able to play this game, too. UAE can run some ports for 6.8 billion if we can manage their oil facilities and ports and the Strait of Hormuz for the same price. If they scream "sovereignty", we say: "See?".
12 posted on
02/18/2006 7:11:53 PM PST by
Migraine
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson