"The port contract was already foreign-run, so the headline is false on its face. And this suit is against the British company and is purely a matter of contract law."
Hmmmm...lets see,....British run port,...or UAE backed company run port...hmmmm...lets see,...UAE backed Taliban Government,....British helped take down Taliban Govt....hmmm... My vote would be to keep it British. So much for "false on its face", and "purely contractual." The main thing is to ensure that the story is journalistically correct, and contractual law is upheld. What a loon. With that line of thought, heck lets give Hamas the janitorial contract at Congress.
If you want to be a smartass, that's fine with me. If facts don't matter to you, I'm okay with that.
You don't need no steenkin' facts. Grab your pitchfork and go do your stuff.
The grownups will clean up your mess.
The British Company SOLD to the Dubai group...WE don't get the choice between the two..