[sandbar]

>>>yes, removing the foreskin IS akin to female circumcision, both are done for hygiene, both are done by muslims and jews, and both are done for cosmetic reasons.>>>

You are incorrect. The female circumcision is to remove sexual satisfaction by the female, to keep them from becoming sexual creatures, which in the muslim/african world is just awful.

[esoxmagnum]

sandbar, once again you are completely out of touch with reality.

During the 1800's, clipping boys again became popular to discourage masturbation. That is to say, it reduces pleasure for the male by removing the foreskin. It inhibits pleasure. Same thing. No different.

You can bury your head in the sand if you wish, justifying your reasons for clipping your own kids or trying to make your husband feel more secure, whatever, but don't lie.

Coupled with your penchant for choosing men based on their penis, your out of wedlock sex and your habits of distorting the truth and they ducking for cover, I'd say you may be in the wrong forum.

You can call me Hannity if you want (as you already have), but if it walks like a duck, and it quacks like a duck, I'd say it is a duck. Just because you put a W sticker on your car don't make you conservative. Closing your legs and opening your mind will go allot further into convincing me as to what you are.

Brief history lesson for you here, but there are numerous articles that state that clipping was re-introduced to the US for reasons of masturbation. http://www.cirp.org/library/history/

By the way, the argument that GWBush is clipped (I think that was yours) doesn't matter much to me. I don't think hes much of a conservative. But, I do know the Pope probably aint, neither was George Washington, or Ben Franklin or any of our other FORE Fathers (pun intended). But, it is most likely that Slick Willy was. My wife recalls reading the testimony on it a few years back....